MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968288905 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.13742599

Triepeolus oblongimacula Onuferko & Rightmyer, 2024, sp. nov.

2024· article· en· W6968288905 sur OpenAlexaffabout

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2024
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Établissements canadiensCanadian Museum of Nature
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSetaDorsumProjection (relational algebra)AxillaKeel

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Triepeolus oblongimacula sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A939584A-99F2-4D1C-B4A5-23D778D8B027 Figs 4B, 8B, 9C, 12H, 15C, 23 Proposed common name Oblong-spot triepeolus. Diagnosis The following morphological features in combination tell T. oblongimacula sp. nov. apart from all other Triepeolus in the simplex species group: the axillae are entirely black and large, each with the tip extending beyond the midlength of the mesoscutellum (but not as far back as its posterior margin) and the free portion distinctly pointed, hooked (i.e., concave along the medial margin), and mesally unattached to the mesoscutellum for more than a third the medial length of the axilla (Fig. 23B); the mesopleura laterally do not have erect/suberect, simple setae or have only sparse, short (<¼ MOD), erect/suberect, simple setae in addition to the usual appressed, branched setae (Fig. 9C); the trochanters are normal (i.e., not tuberculate) (Fig. 9C); the dorsum of the mesosoma and metasoma have bands of pale-yellow tomentum (Figs 8B, 15C, 23); and the T1 discal patch is broadly rounded laterally and rod-shaped with an inverted U- or horseshoe-shaped anteromedial projection (Figs 15C, 23B). Triepeolus oblongimacula most closely resembles T. obliteratus and T. rhododontus, but in T. obliteratus the dorsum of the mesosoma and metasoma have bands of pale-gray to white/off-white tomentum, the legs are never (as opposed to commonly; Fig. 23A–C) entirely reddish orange from trochanters to tarsi, and the pseudopygidial area of the female is never (as opposed to uncommonly) reddish orange, and in T. rhododontus the T1 discal patch is somewhat narrowed and/or curved posterolaterally and thus allantoid and the axillae commonly have reddish tips, especially in the West where the species’ range overlaps with that of T. oblongimacula. Etymology The specific epithet is a Latin noun in apposition meaning ‘oblong-spot’ and refers to the shape of the T1 discal patch. Material examined Primary type material USA • ♀, holotype; New Mexico, Rodeo, Hidalgo County; 7 Sep. 1973; M. Favreau leg.; AMNH. Secondary type material MEXICO – Chihuahua • 1 ♀, paratype; 10 mi N of Jiménez; 10 Sep. 1950; R.F. Smith leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; Samalayuca; 6 Oct. 1966; G.E. and A.S. Bohart leg.; BBSL BBSL581796. USA – Arizona • 1 ♀, paratype; 10 mi NW of Douglas, Cochise County; 7 Sep. 1975; E.S. Ross leg.; CAS • 1 ♀, paratype; 2 mi NE of Portal, Cochise County; 11 Sep. 1960; Cazier and Feight leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 22 Aug. 1967; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 28.3 mi S of Portal, Cochise County; 31.8420° N, 109.2520° W; 22 Aug. 2000; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI 11991 /M.G.R. Database No. 1387 • 1 ♀, paratype; 3 mi E of Portal, Cochise County; 13 Sep. 1955; C. and M. Cazier leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 7 mi W of Tombstone, Cochise County; 29 Sep. 1963; V.L. Vesterby leg.; UCBME • 1 ♀, paratype; Apache, Cochise County; 28 Sep. 1980; J.G. Rozen leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 30 Aug.–1 Sep. 1986; K.V. Krombein leg.; USNM • 1 ♀, paratype; Box Canyon, Pima County; 31.7998° N, 110.7572° W; 15 Sep. 1994; T.L. Griswold leg.; BBSL BBSL582189 • 1 ♀, paratype; Double Adobe, Cochise County; 7 Sep. 1975; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; EMEC M.G.R. Database No. 1389 • 1 ♀, paratype; Mount Graham Road (Pinaleño Mountains), Graham County; 27 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; Pearce to Cochise Stronghold, Cochise County; 1 Sep. 1991; L. Stange and R. Miller leg.; FSCA • 1 ♀, paratype; Pinaleño Mountains, Graham County; 22 Aug. 1980; C.A. Olson leg.; UAIC • 1 ♀, paratype; Southwestern Research Station (5 mi W of Portal), Cochise County; 4 Sep. 1962; S.J. Hessel leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 9 Sep. 1966; P.H. Arnaud, Jr leg.; CAS • 1 ♀, paratype; Sunglow West Turkey Creek (Chiricahua Mountains), Cochise County; 12 Sep. 1991; J.G. and B.L. Rozen leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; Tombstone, Cochise County; 12 Sep. 1940; R.H. Crandall leg.; UAIC • 1 ♀, paratype; West Turkey Creek (13 mi E of Sunizona), Cochise County; 5 Sep. 1983; J.G. Rozen and M. Favreau leg.; AMNH. – Colorado • 1 ♀, paratype; 8.3 mi N of Roggen (along route 386), Weld County; 15 Sep. 1992; L.R. Davis, Jr. leg.; FSCA • 2 ♀♀, paratypes; Boulder County; 18 Sep. 1925; C.P. Custer leg.; UCMC • 1 ♀, paratype; Roggen; 15 Sep. ??31; UCMC • 1 ♂, paratype; Colorado, Sandhills 3 mi N of Roggen, Weld County; 7 Sep. 1991; M.J. Weissmann leg.; CSUC. – New Mexico • 1 ♀, paratype; 11 km NW of Bayard, Grant County; 32.7920° N, 108.2430° W; 2 Sep. 2009; C.S. Sheffield and S. Dumesh leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_013; PCYU PCYU-SD09:573 • 1 ♀, paratype; 11.2 km NE of Bayard, Grant County; 32.8110° N, 108.0260° W; 2 Sep. 2009; C.S. Sheffield and S. Dumesh leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_031; PCYU PCYU-SD09:112 • 2 ♀♀, paratypes; 17 mi S of Animas, Hidalgo County; 30 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 20 mi E of Animas, Hidalgo County; 20 Sep. 1999; M.G. Rightmyer leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 27–32 mi S of Animas, Hidalgo County; 24 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH M.G.R. Database No. 1207 • 1 ♀, paratype; 5 mi E of Lordsburg, Hidalgo County; 14 Oct. 1970; J.C. and F.M. Hall leg.; UCR UCRC ENT 57233 • 1 ♀, paratype; 6 mi NW of Silver City, Grant County; 11–12 Sep. 1974; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; EMEC • 1 ♀, paratype; Animas, Hidalgo County; 4–5 Aug. 1974; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; EMEC M.G.R. Database No. 1385 • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 26 Aug. 2015; L. Packer leg.; PCYU • 1 ♀, paratype; Granite Gap (18 mi N of Rodeo); 7 Sep. 1976; R.M. Bohart leg.; UCBME • 1 ♀, paratype; Hwy 80, 6 km S of Hwy 10; 32.1831° N, 108.9481° W; 30 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield, S. Dumesh, and L. Packer leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_023; PCYU • 1 ♀, paratype; Mescalero Sands (45 mi E of Roswell), Chaves County; 12–13 Sep. 1959; E.R. Tinkham leg.; CAS • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 12–13 Sep. 1959; E.R. Tinkham leg.; USNM • 1 ♂, allotype; Near Hwy 10, Doña Ana County; 32.2420° N, 107.1930° W; 30 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield and S. Dumesh leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_298; PCYU PCYU-SD09:28 • 1 ♀, paratype; Silver City; 32.7130° N, 108.2970° W; 31 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_035; PCYU PCYU-CSNM-09-184. – Oklahoma • 1 ♀, paratype; Norman (Canadian River), Cleveland County; 35.2007° N, 97.4964° W; 21 Oct. 2021; K.L.J. Hung leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_421; OKBS OKBS.POL.810. – South Dakota • 3 ♀♀, paratypes; Forestburg; 8 Sep. 1928; H.C. Severin leg.; USNM M.G.R. Database Nos 1375 to 1377. – Texas • 1 ♀, paratype; 8 mi NW of Girvin, Pecos County; 9 Sep. 1989; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI K07230 • 1 ♀, paratype; Dallas; 5 Oct. 1905; F.C. Bishopp leg.; USNM • 1 ♀, paratype; Pedernales Falls State Park, Blanco County; 11 Oct. 1995; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI 07724 • 1 ♀, paratype; Red River, Hwy 81, Montague County; 12 Oct. 2002; B. Kondratieff, J. Owens, and J. Schmidt leg.; CSUC • 1 ♀, paratype; Redford, Presidio County; 16 Oct. 1998; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI 09280 /M.G.R. Database No. 1388. DNA barcoded material Available. BIN: BOLD:AEE4216. See type material for specimens examined and sequenced (indicated by unique BOLD sample ID). Description MEASUREMENTS OF HOLOTYPE. Body length 11.7 mm; ITW 2.4 mm; head length 2.7 mm; head width 3.9 mm; fore wing length 8.6 mm. Both sexes INTEGUMENT COLORATION. Dark brown to black except as follows.Mandible with apical third golden yellow. Mandible with basal two-thirds (except for extreme base), labrum along apical and lateral margins, F1 to some extent, coxae to some extent, trochanters to tibiae (excluding brown meso- and metatibial spurs) partially to entirely, and tarsi entirely orange. F2 with orange spot basally. Tegula reddish brown. Fore wing membrane subhyaline, apically dusky. Hind wing membrane dusky subhyaline to hyaline. Pygidial plate to some extent reddish brown (difficult to see in holotype because T6 mostly retracted; described from paratypes). PUBESCENCE. Face with tomentum densest around antennal socket. Clypeus, upper paraocular and frontal areas, and vertexal area mostly exposed. Pronotal collar with tomentum uniformly pale yellow. Mesoscutum with well-defined paramedian band of pale-yellow tomentum; pale tomentum otherwise mostly restricted to lateral and posterior margins. Mesopleuron with off-white to pale-yellow, appressed, branched setae; upper half densely setose, except behind pronotal lobe, with setae slightly sparser on hypoepimeral area; ventrolateral half nearly bare, except along margins. Mesopleuron with sparse, pale-yellow, erect/suberect, simple setae (less than ½ MOD in length) in addition to usual appressed, branched setae. Metanotum with tomentum uninterrupted, uniformly pale yellow. Propodeal triangle mostly glabrous, with (pale) setae restricted to small lateral patches. Metasomal terga with bands of pale-yellow tomentum. T1 with basal transverse band interrupted medially, apical transverse band complete (narrowly interrupted medially in some paratypes), transverse bands subparallel, discal patch transversely oblong or elliptic. T2–T4 with apical transverse bands complete and medially somewhat removed from apical margins of terga, that of T2 with pair of basomedially convergent anterolateral extensions. S2–S3 with medially interrupted apical transverse bands of white tomentum (reduced to posterolateral patches in holotype and some paratypes). SURFACE SCULPTURE. Labrum coarsely and densely (most i <1d) rugose-punctate. Clypeus densely punctate (most i <1d) but interspaces well defined, shining; with many small punctures among larger ones. Vertexal area somewhat sparsely punctate (some i>2d), especially around ocelli. Mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, and axilla with punctures more or less equally dense and nearly contiguous (most i <1d). Mesopleuron with punctures in upper half nearly contiguous and denser (i <1d) than in ventrolateral half (i

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,950
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,982

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0270,019

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2024
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetEngineering Education and PedagogyTravaux en français237 207