Triepeolus oblongimacula Onuferko & Rightmyer, 2024, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Triepeolus oblongimacula sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: A939584A-99F2-4D1C-B4A5-23D778D8B027 Figs 4B, 8B, 9C, 12H, 15C, 23 Proposed common name Oblong-spot triepeolus. Diagnosis The following morphological features in combination tell T. oblongimacula sp. nov. apart from all other Triepeolus in the simplex species group: the axillae are entirely black and large, each with the tip extending beyond the midlength of the mesoscutellum (but not as far back as its posterior margin) and the free portion distinctly pointed, hooked (i.e., concave along the medial margin), and mesally unattached to the mesoscutellum for more than a third the medial length of the axilla (Fig. 23B); the mesopleura laterally do not have erect/suberect, simple setae or have only sparse, short (<¼ MOD), erect/suberect, simple setae in addition to the usual appressed, branched setae (Fig. 9C); the trochanters are normal (i.e., not tuberculate) (Fig. 9C); the dorsum of the mesosoma and metasoma have bands of pale-yellow tomentum (Figs 8B, 15C, 23); and the T1 discal patch is broadly rounded laterally and rod-shaped with an inverted U- or horseshoe-shaped anteromedial projection (Figs 15C, 23B). Triepeolus oblongimacula most closely resembles T. obliteratus and T. rhododontus, but in T. obliteratus the dorsum of the mesosoma and metasoma have bands of pale-gray to white/off-white tomentum, the legs are never (as opposed to commonly; Fig. 23A–C) entirely reddish orange from trochanters to tarsi, and the pseudopygidial area of the female is never (as opposed to uncommonly) reddish orange, and in T. rhododontus the T1 discal patch is somewhat narrowed and/or curved posterolaterally and thus allantoid and the axillae commonly have reddish tips, especially in the West where the species’ range overlaps with that of T. oblongimacula. Etymology The specific epithet is a Latin noun in apposition meaning ‘oblong-spot’ and refers to the shape of the T1 discal patch. Material examined Primary type material USA • ♀, holotype; New Mexico, Rodeo, Hidalgo County; 7 Sep. 1973; M. Favreau leg.; AMNH. Secondary type material MEXICO – Chihuahua • 1 ♀, paratype; 10 mi N of Jiménez; 10 Sep. 1950; R.F. Smith leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; Samalayuca; 6 Oct. 1966; G.E. and A.S. Bohart leg.; BBSL BBSL581796. USA – Arizona • 1 ♀, paratype; 10 mi NW of Douglas, Cochise County; 7 Sep. 1975; E.S. Ross leg.; CAS • 1 ♀, paratype; 2 mi NE of Portal, Cochise County; 11 Sep. 1960; Cazier and Feight leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 22 Aug. 1967; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 28.3 mi S of Portal, Cochise County; 31.8420° N, 109.2520° W; 22 Aug. 2000; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI 11991 /M.G.R. Database No. 1387 • 1 ♀, paratype; 3 mi E of Portal, Cochise County; 13 Sep. 1955; C. and M. Cazier leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 7 mi W of Tombstone, Cochise County; 29 Sep. 1963; V.L. Vesterby leg.; UCBME • 1 ♀, paratype; Apache, Cochise County; 28 Sep. 1980; J.G. Rozen leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 30 Aug.–1 Sep. 1986; K.V. Krombein leg.; USNM • 1 ♀, paratype; Box Canyon, Pima County; 31.7998° N, 110.7572° W; 15 Sep. 1994; T.L. Griswold leg.; BBSL BBSL582189 • 1 ♀, paratype; Double Adobe, Cochise County; 7 Sep. 1975; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; EMEC M.G.R. Database No. 1389 • 1 ♀, paratype; Mount Graham Road (Pinaleño Mountains), Graham County; 27 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; Pearce to Cochise Stronghold, Cochise County; 1 Sep. 1991; L. Stange and R. Miller leg.; FSCA • 1 ♀, paratype; Pinaleño Mountains, Graham County; 22 Aug. 1980; C.A. Olson leg.; UAIC • 1 ♀, paratype; Southwestern Research Station (5 mi W of Portal), Cochise County; 4 Sep. 1962; S.J. Hessel leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 9 Sep. 1966; P.H. Arnaud, Jr leg.; CAS • 1 ♀, paratype; Sunglow West Turkey Creek (Chiricahua Mountains), Cochise County; 12 Sep. 1991; J.G. and B.L. Rozen leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; Tombstone, Cochise County; 12 Sep. 1940; R.H. Crandall leg.; UAIC • 1 ♀, paratype; West Turkey Creek (13 mi E of Sunizona), Cochise County; 5 Sep. 1983; J.G. Rozen and M. Favreau leg.; AMNH. – Colorado • 1 ♀, paratype; 8.3 mi N of Roggen (along route 386), Weld County; 15 Sep. 1992; L.R. Davis, Jr. leg.; FSCA • 2 ♀♀, paratypes; Boulder County; 18 Sep. 1925; C.P. Custer leg.; UCMC • 1 ♀, paratype; Roggen; 15 Sep. ??31; UCMC • 1 ♂, paratype; Colorado, Sandhills 3 mi N of Roggen, Weld County; 7 Sep. 1991; M.J. Weissmann leg.; CSUC. – New Mexico • 1 ♀, paratype; 11 km NW of Bayard, Grant County; 32.7920° N, 108.2430° W; 2 Sep. 2009; C.S. Sheffield and S. Dumesh leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_013; PCYU PCYU-SD09:573 • 1 ♀, paratype; 11.2 km NE of Bayard, Grant County; 32.8110° N, 108.0260° W; 2 Sep. 2009; C.S. Sheffield and S. Dumesh leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_031; PCYU PCYU-SD09:112 • 2 ♀♀, paratypes; 17 mi S of Animas, Hidalgo County; 30 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 20 mi E of Animas, Hidalgo County; 20 Sep. 1999; M.G. Rightmyer leg.; AMNH • 1 ♀, paratype; 27–32 mi S of Animas, Hidalgo County; 24 Aug. 1994; J.G. Rozen and J.S. Ascher leg.; AMNH M.G.R. Database No. 1207 • 1 ♀, paratype; 5 mi E of Lordsburg, Hidalgo County; 14 Oct. 1970; J.C. and F.M. Hall leg.; UCR UCRC ENT 57233 • 1 ♀, paratype; 6 mi NW of Silver City, Grant County; 11–12 Sep. 1974; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; EMEC • 1 ♀, paratype; Animas, Hidalgo County; 4–5 Aug. 1974; E.G. and J.M. Linsley leg.; EMEC M.G.R. Database No. 1385 • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 26 Aug. 2015; L. Packer leg.; PCYU • 1 ♀, paratype; Granite Gap (18 mi N of Rodeo); 7 Sep. 1976; R.M. Bohart leg.; UCBME • 1 ♀, paratype; Hwy 80, 6 km S of Hwy 10; 32.1831° N, 108.9481° W; 30 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield, S. Dumesh, and L. Packer leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_023; PCYU • 1 ♀, paratype; Mescalero Sands (45 mi E of Roswell), Chaves County; 12–13 Sep. 1959; E.R. Tinkham leg.; CAS • 1 ♀, paratype; same data as for preceding; 12–13 Sep. 1959; E.R. Tinkham leg.; USNM • 1 ♂, allotype; Near Hwy 10, Doña Ana County; 32.2420° N, 107.1930° W; 30 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield and S. Dumesh leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_298; PCYU PCYU-SD09:28 • 1 ♀, paratype; Silver City; 32.7130° N, 108.2970° W; 31 Aug. 2009; C.S. Sheffield leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_035; PCYU PCYU-CSNM-09-184. – Oklahoma • 1 ♀, paratype; Norman (Canadian River), Cleveland County; 35.2007° N, 97.4964° W; 21 Oct. 2021; K.L.J. Hung leg.; BOLD sample ID: CMNTO_421; OKBS OKBS.POL.810. – South Dakota • 3 ♀♀, paratypes; Forestburg; 8 Sep. 1928; H.C. Severin leg.; USNM M.G.R. Database Nos 1375 to 1377. – Texas • 1 ♀, paratype; 8 mi NW of Girvin, Pecos County; 9 Sep. 1989; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI K07230 • 1 ♀, paratype; Dallas; 5 Oct. 1905; F.C. Bishopp leg.; USNM • 1 ♀, paratype; Pedernales Falls State Park, Blanco County; 11 Oct. 1995; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI 07724 • 1 ♀, paratype; Red River, Hwy 81, Montague County; 12 Oct. 2002; B. Kondratieff, J. Owens, and J. Schmidt leg.; CSUC • 1 ♀, paratype; Redford, Presidio County; 16 Oct. 1998; J.L. Neff leg.; CTMI 09280 /M.G.R. Database No. 1388. DNA barcoded material Available. BIN: BOLD:AEE4216. See type material for specimens examined and sequenced (indicated by unique BOLD sample ID). Description MEASUREMENTS OF HOLOTYPE. Body length 11.7 mm; ITW 2.4 mm; head length 2.7 mm; head width 3.9 mm; fore wing length 8.6 mm. Both sexes INTEGUMENT COLORATION. Dark brown to black except as follows.Mandible with apical third golden yellow. Mandible with basal two-thirds (except for extreme base), labrum along apical and lateral margins, F1 to some extent, coxae to some extent, trochanters to tibiae (excluding brown meso- and metatibial spurs) partially to entirely, and tarsi entirely orange. F2 with orange spot basally. Tegula reddish brown. Fore wing membrane subhyaline, apically dusky. Hind wing membrane dusky subhyaline to hyaline. Pygidial plate to some extent reddish brown (difficult to see in holotype because T6 mostly retracted; described from paratypes). PUBESCENCE. Face with tomentum densest around antennal socket. Clypeus, upper paraocular and frontal areas, and vertexal area mostly exposed. Pronotal collar with tomentum uniformly pale yellow. Mesoscutum with well-defined paramedian band of pale-yellow tomentum; pale tomentum otherwise mostly restricted to lateral and posterior margins. Mesopleuron with off-white to pale-yellow, appressed, branched setae; upper half densely setose, except behind pronotal lobe, with setae slightly sparser on hypoepimeral area; ventrolateral half nearly bare, except along margins. Mesopleuron with sparse, pale-yellow, erect/suberect, simple setae (less than ½ MOD in length) in addition to usual appressed, branched setae. Metanotum with tomentum uninterrupted, uniformly pale yellow. Propodeal triangle mostly glabrous, with (pale) setae restricted to small lateral patches. Metasomal terga with bands of pale-yellow tomentum. T1 with basal transverse band interrupted medially, apical transverse band complete (narrowly interrupted medially in some paratypes), transverse bands subparallel, discal patch transversely oblong or elliptic. T2–T4 with apical transverse bands complete and medially somewhat removed from apical margins of terga, that of T2 with pair of basomedially convergent anterolateral extensions. S2–S3 with medially interrupted apical transverse bands of white tomentum (reduced to posterolateral patches in holotype and some paratypes). SURFACE SCULPTURE. Labrum coarsely and densely (most i <1d) rugose-punctate. Clypeus densely punctate (most i <1d) but interspaces well defined, shining; with many small punctures among larger ones. Vertexal area somewhat sparsely punctate (some i>2d), especially around ocelli. Mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, and axilla with punctures more or less equally dense and nearly contiguous (most i <1d). Mesopleuron with punctures in upper half nearly contiguous and denser (i <1d) than in ventrolateral half (i
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".