Empis (Enoplempis) scotti Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Empis (Enoplempis) scotti sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 201C66EF-F42C-4651-9987-4BAA28E84D6F (Figs 207, 221–223, 237) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂ (Figs 221–223), labelled: “USA: OR: Benton Co., Corvallis,/ Lewisburg Saddle, below Old / Growth Trail, 44°38′32.28″N / 123°17′20.76″W, Malaise trap,/ over creek, 23.iv–6.v.2013, S. Fitzgerald, CNC350416 ”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / scotti Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (CNC). PARATYPES: USA. California: Humboldt County: 2 mi. W Briceland [40°06′N 123°54′W], 21.v.1976, R. Dietz, J. Hafernik (1♂, EMEC). Mendocino County: Calif. Coast Range Pres., 5 mi. N Branscomb [39°42′N 123°39′W], 26.v.1976, JAP (1♂, EMEC); same data except, E. Rogers (1♂, EMEC); NCCRP, 3 mi. N Branscomb, 1400 ft, 17.v.1975, JAP (1♂, EMEC); same data except, 5–6.v.1989, MT, S. O’Keefe (1♂, EMEC). Oregon: Benton County: Corvallis, 3430 NW Deer Run St., 44°36′6″N 123°18′51″W, 20.iv–6.vi.2018, MT, SJF (1♂, 3♀, CNC); McDonald Forest, Oak Creek, 44.605623°N 123.332986°W, 20.v.2014, hillside woods and seep, SJF (1♂, CNC); Rock Ck, 5 mi. W Philomath [44.5020°N 123.4426°W], 2.v.1952, V. Roth (1♂, OSAC). Coos County: ca 3 mi. SE of Remote, Rock Ck, 42°59′27″N 123°51′41″W, 28.v.2009, SEB (1♂, CNC). Douglas County: ca 5.5 mi. SW Camas Valley, Twelvemile Ck, 42°58′41″N 123°44′29″W, 27.v.2009, J.M. Cumming (1♂, CNC); 7 mi. SW Camas Valley, Bear Ck Recreation Site, 42°58′08″N 123°45′55″W, 27.v.2009, SEB (1♂, CNC); 7 mi. SW Camas Valley, Bridge Ck at Twelvemile Ck Rd, 42°58′07″N 123°43′29″W, 27.v.2009, SEB (1♂, CNC). Washington County: Forest Grove [45°31′N 123°06′W], 12.iv.1919 (1♂, EMEC). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of the E. (En.) teres species group by the pair of dark scutal vittae, male hind femur strongly bowed on apical third with anteroventral row of strong setae, without tuft of whip-like setae at base of ventral process (Figs 222, 223), epandrium with long apical and ventral setae, and dorsal margin of male cercus straight. Description. Wing length 4.4–5.5 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) teres, except as follows: head narrowly dichoptic, frons below ocellar triangle slightly narrower than width of anterior ocellus; with short setulae along inner margin of eye. Occiput bearing single row of strong setae, shorter than ocellar setae; postocular setae shorter than occipital setae. Antenna with postpedicel long and tapered, 6× longer than basal width. Thorax with postpronotal lobe with pale shiny apex; postalar ridge yellowish. Scutum with 1–2 posterior npl. Scutellum with 1 pair of long sctl, with 1–3 pairs of marginal setulae. Legs slender, orange brown, including coxae, apex of tibiae darker, tarsi brown; coxae with greyish pruinescence (Fig. 221). Fore femur without white ventral pile. Fore tibia with several longer anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae on apical third, no longer than width of tibia; anterior face with short appressed setae; apex with long posterior and ventral preapical setae. Fore tarsomere 1 swollen, nearly subequal in width to width of apex of tibia; without spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–3 with long dorsal setae, longer than width of tarsomere; tarsomeres 2–5 with biserial row of spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, longer than width of segment. Mid femur with white ventral pile; row of short posteroventral setae, shorter that femur width. Mid tibia with anteroventral and posteroventral setae, shorter than width of tibia; rows of short anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae, similar to ventral setae. Mid tarsus with all tarsomeres with biserial row of spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 1–4 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, longer than width of segment. Hind femur with white ventral pile and anteroventral and posteroventral row of slender setae on basal two-thirds; apical third strongly bowed with anteroventral row of strong setae, shorter than width of femur; preapex with broad ventral expansion tapered to narrow posteroventral apex and flattened anteroventral hooked lobe; posteroventral face with row of 3 peg-like setae and upper row of long slender setae; apex without preapical row of posterior setae; strong preapical anterior seta and 2 preapical anterodorsal setae (Figs 222, 223). Hind tibia greatly narrowed and twisted at base; without anteroventral process; posteroventral process knob-like, with rounded apex crowned with dense, dark thickened setae and row of similar setae on anterior face of apex; dense row of thickened anteroventral setae extending from base of posteroventral process to near apex; long anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae, twice as long as width of tibia; anterior and ventral faces with similar shorter erect setae (Figs 221–223). Hind tarsus with long dorsal setae on tarsomeres 1–3; tarsomere 1 swollen, narrower than apex of tibia with strong ventral setae; tarsomeres 2–5 similar to fore tarsus. Halter yellowish to whitish. Abdomen paler than thorax, with dense whitish-grey pruinescence, with dark marginal setae. Terminalia (Fig. 207): brown with dorsal margin of cercus blackish; epandrial lamella with grey pruinescence. Cercus long, narrow, tapered to narrow apex; dorsal margin straight; dense setae along dorsal margin, shorter than width of cercus; base weakly fused to epandrial lamella. Subepandrial process extending on either side of phallus; apex narrow, downcurved. Epandrial lamella narrow, linear, longer than height; dorsal margin slightly expanded subapically; bearing long setae apically and ventrally, longer than width of lamella. Hypandrium very short, truncate, not prolonged laterally; without setae. Phallus with basal third narrow, tapered, gently arched anteriorly; apex emerging beyond cercus; apex slender and downcurved in lateral view; roughened, spiculate subapically, near dorsal margin of epandrium; ejaculatory apodeme elongate, more than half-length of epandrium, Y-shaped, with ventrally positioned lateral apodemes. Female. Similar to male, except as follows: frons broader, slightly wider than anterior ocellus ocellar triangle; scutum with 2 pairs of broader brownish vittae; hindleg without modified setae and processes. Abdominal pleural membrane not expanded; apex of tergite 8 shiny. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 237). Empis (En.) scotti sp. nov. is known from the Coast Range in Oregon and northern California. Adults have been collected in April and May. Etymology. This species is named after fellow dipterist Scott J. Fitzgerald, who collected the holotype. Nuptial gift presentation. Form unknown. Remarks. Empis (En.) fitzgeraldi sp. nov., E. (En.) undulasetosa sp. nov. and E. (En.) scotti sp. nov. are sympatric and were collected during the same collection event.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».