Hyperomyzus (Neonasonovia) nabali
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hyperomyzus (Neonasonovia) nabali (Oestlund, 1886) Rhopalosiphum nabali was described by Oestlund (1886: 34) and subsequently transferred to Amphorophora Buckton, 1876 by Oestlund (1923: 143). It was later transferred to Neonasonovia when this taxon had genus rank, by Hille Ris Lambers (1974: 132), and finally to Hyperomyzus (in the subgenus Neonasonovia) by Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers (1976: 121). Viviparous females have been formally described; they have ornamented siphunculi. The species is host-alternating between Ribes, as primary host, and Prenanthes. It is known in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Quebec (Canada), and in the District of Columbia, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah (United States). Studied specimens. Canada: New Brunswick, Fredericton, on Prenanthes alba, 3-IX-1956, Hille Ris Lambers & MacGillivray leg. and 6-VII-1960, MacGillivray & Anderson leg., respectively 6 apt and 3 apt; Quebec, Laurentide Park, on Ribes glandulosum, 28-VIII-1956, Hille Ris Lambers leg., 4 al (gynoparae) & 4 ov; all specimens: Hille Ris Lambers det. and Natural History Museum collection. Apterous viviparous females, virginogeniae or exules (Figures 1 A, 1B), complementary data. The dorsal sclerotization and pigmentation is diverse: in six studied specimens the dorsum is completely pale, as previously described, with very faint rough cuticle around the base of setae and markedly rough sclerotized areas in abdominal segments 6 to 8. In the other three studied specimens there are relatively extensive, rough and pigmented setiferous sclerites in abdominal segments 2 to 8, which sometimes merge to form transverse bands. Antennae from yellowish-brown (in specimens without setiferous sclerites) to brown (in specimens with these sclerites), with darker segment VI and small distal portions of the other segments of antennal flagellum. Legs mostly yellowbrown to brown, tarsi and the apex of tibiae as dark as antennal segment VI. Siphunculi strongly swollen, becoming darker at apex, and bearing dispersed spinules or scales. Quantitative characteristics in table 1. …Continued on next page Alate viviparous females (gynoparae) (Figure 1 C), complementary data. Antennae and most of legs brown to dark brown; antennal segments I and II, coxae, trochanters and proximal part of femora dusky and progressively darker; siphuncular peduncle weakly pigmented and swollen part brown; cauda almost as dark as most pigmented part of siphunculi. Secondary sensoria more numerous than stated by Blackman & Eastop (2016). Abdomen bearing marginal sclerites light-brown to brown in addition to unpigmented or very pale setiferous and pleural sclerites. Siphunculi similar to those of apterae. Quantitative characteristics in table 1. Oviparous females (Figures 1 D, 1E), description from 4 specimens. Similar to apterous viviparous females, with antennal segment I somewhat more pigmented and cauda much shorter and blunter at apex. Proximal part of hind tibiae (40% of total length) strongly inflated, as dark as distal parts of femora, and densely covered with 130– 190 scent plates. Genital plate, as usual, bipigmented and with abundance of setae, 12–14 anterior and discal, and 25–26 marginal-posterior. Other quantitative characteristics in table 1. Comments. The heteroecious holocycle of the species was suspected by Blackman & Eastop (2016), it has been confirmed with the description of oviparous females.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,022 | 0,009 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».