MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968607042 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5587358

Hyperomyzus (Neonasonovia) nabali

2017· article· en· W6968607042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicStudy of Mite Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaDorsumSubgenusTaxonCuticle (hair)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperomyzus (Neonasonovia) nabali (Oestlund, 1886) Rhopalosiphum nabali was described by Oestlund (1886: 34) and subsequently transferred to Amphorophora Buckton, 1876 by Oestlund (1923: 143). It was later transferred to Neonasonovia when this taxon had genus rank, by Hille Ris Lambers (1974: 132), and finally to Hyperomyzus (in the subgenus Neonasonovia) by Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers (1976: 121). Viviparous females have been formally described; they have ornamented siphunculi. The species is host-alternating between Ribes, as primary host, and Prenanthes. It is known in Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Quebec (Canada), and in the District of Columbia, Illinois, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah (United States). Studied specimens. Canada: New Brunswick, Fredericton, on Prenanthes alba, 3-IX-1956, Hille Ris Lambers & MacGillivray leg. and 6-VII-1960, MacGillivray & Anderson leg., respectively 6 apt and 3 apt; Quebec, Laurentide Park, on Ribes glandulosum, 28-VIII-1956, Hille Ris Lambers leg., 4 al (gynoparae) & 4 ov; all specimens: Hille Ris Lambers det. and Natural History Museum collection. Apterous viviparous females, virginogeniae or exules (Figures 1 A, 1B), complementary data. The dorsal sclerotization and pigmentation is diverse: in six studied specimens the dorsum is completely pale, as previously described, with very faint rough cuticle around the base of setae and markedly rough sclerotized areas in abdominal segments 6 to 8. In the other three studied specimens there are relatively extensive, rough and pigmented setiferous sclerites in abdominal segments 2 to 8, which sometimes merge to form transverse bands. Antennae from yellowish-brown (in specimens without setiferous sclerites) to brown (in specimens with these sclerites), with darker segment VI and small distal portions of the other segments of antennal flagellum. Legs mostly yellowbrown to brown, tarsi and the apex of tibiae as dark as antennal segment VI. Siphunculi strongly swollen, becoming darker at apex, and bearing dispersed spinules or scales. Quantitative characteristics in table 1. …Continued on next page Alate viviparous females (gynoparae) (Figure 1 C), complementary data. Antennae and most of legs brown to dark brown; antennal segments I and II, coxae, trochanters and proximal part of femora dusky and progressively darker; siphuncular peduncle weakly pigmented and swollen part brown; cauda almost as dark as most pigmented part of siphunculi. Secondary sensoria more numerous than stated by Blackman & Eastop (2016). Abdomen bearing marginal sclerites light-brown to brown in addition to unpigmented or very pale setiferous and pleural sclerites. Siphunculi similar to those of apterae. Quantitative characteristics in table 1. Oviparous females (Figures 1 D, 1E), description from 4 specimens. Similar to apterous viviparous females, with antennal segment I somewhat more pigmented and cauda much shorter and blunter at apex. Proximal part of hind tibiae (40% of total length) strongly inflated, as dark as distal parts of femora, and densely covered with 130– 190 scent plates. Genital plate, as usual, bipigmented and with abundance of setae, 12–14 anterior and discal, and 25–26 marginal-posterior. Other quantitative characteristics in table 1. Comments. The heteroecious holocycle of the species was suspected by Blackman & Eastop (2016), it has been confirmed with the description of oviparous females.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicStudy of Mite SpeciesFrench-language works237,207