Hydnobius longidens LeConte 1879
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hydnobius longidens LeConte, 1879, resurrected status (Figs. 29–35, 36) Hydnobius longidens LeConte, 1879: 511. Hydnobius lobatus Hatch, 1936: 35; 1957: 25, new synonymy. Type material. H. longidens described from unique specimen which becomes the holotype, male, in MCZC, LeConte collection; bearing white label “Garland / 22-6 Col”; white label male symbol; white handwritten label “265”; red and white label “Type / 3161”; white handwritten label “ H. longidens / LeC.”; and our red holotype label; seen and dissected. Type locality: Fort Garland, Costillo County, Colorado. Hydnobius lobatus described from unique specimen which becomes the holotype, female (described as a male) in USNM; bearing white label “Manchester, Wash. / IV, 22, 1934”; red label “TYPE [male symbol] / Hydnobius / lobatus / 1935 – M.H. Hatch”; our white female symbol label; and our red holotype label; seen and dissected. Type locality: Manchester, WA. Additional material examined. We examined 294 specimens (See Appendix). Diagnosis. Body reddish brown, shining. Length of pronotum + elytra = 2.2–3.6 mm (males), 2.1–3.6 (females). Punctation of head fine and sparse, finer than pronotum. Pronotum widest near middle, sides obtusely rounded, basal angles obtuse; ratio length:width = 1:1.4; finely punctate with faint reticulate microsculpture. Elytra of medium length, wider than pronotum, ratio length:width = 1:0.7; stria 1 clearly impressed, remaining striae punctate, confused; interval punctures slightly smaller than strial punctures. Antennal club (Fig. 29) moderately broad, ratio club width:length = 1:2.7; width ratio of antennomeres 7:8:9 = 1.2:1:1.6. Mandibles (Fig. 30) moderately elongate; right mandible bidentate apically, with a median tooth on inner margin; left mandible with a tooth on apical one-half of inner margin. Profemur and mesofemur of both sexes unarmed. Male metafemur (Fig. 32) with a large tooth on posterior margin before apex; posterior margin basal to tooth may be irregularly serrulate; female metafemur unarmed. Both sexes with protibia widened apically; male protibial spur (Fig. 31) broad; mesotibia and metatibia moderately broad in both sexes. All tibiae, in both sexes, spinose on outer margin. Male. Aedeagus (Fig. 33) with median lobe broad, narrowing to small rounded lobe at apex. Parameres sinuate, concave medially at apex, with two apical setae. Internal sac apically with curved rows of broad, flat setae, and basally with a pair of sclerotized oblong lobes; lobes visible when internal sac is inverted. Female. Coxites (Fig. 35) elongate, cylindrical, with apical setae; styli minute, inserted at apices of coxites. Sternite 8 (Fig. 34) rounded apically; anterior apophysis broad, weakly rounded apically. Nomenclatural notes. Horn (1880: 281) placed H. longidens LeConte into synonymy under H. longulus LeConte, 1879: 511. However, LeConte described H. longulus from a mixed series which we recognize as Sogda obtusa (LeConte’s “ Type ”) and H. longidens (LeConte’s “ Type 2”). Horn’s action did not solve the problem of application of names. We have resolved this situation by placing H. longulus into synonymy under Sogda obtusa (LeConte, 1879). Our action of attaching names to actual specimens clarifies and stabilizes use of the names. Distribution. The species occurs across North America, from Yukon Territory to Quebec in the north and North Carolina through Arkansas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico to California in the south (Fig. 36). We have seen specimens from Canada: the provinces of British Colombia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, and Yukon Territory; USA: the states of Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia. Field notes and habitats. Most adults have been collected by flight intercept traps and evening sweeping or car netting, in deciduous forests, and infrequently in coniferous forests, or by litter sifting or at black light or in pitfall traps. Seasonality. Adults have been collected from January to September, with the greatest number in June.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».