MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968633537 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5317193

Hydnobius longidens LeConte 1879

2009· article· en· W6968633537 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeWhite (mutation)ReticulateMandible (arthropod mouthpart)Morphology (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydnobius longidens LeConte, 1879, resurrected status (Figs. 29–35, 36) Hydnobius longidens LeConte, 1879: 511. Hydnobius lobatus Hatch, 1936: 35; 1957: 25, new synonymy. Type material. H. longidens described from unique specimen which becomes the holotype, male, in MCZC, LeConte collection; bearing white label “Garland / 22-6 Col”; white label male symbol; white handwritten label “265”; red and white label “Type / 3161”; white handwritten label “ H. longidens / LeC.”; and our red holotype label; seen and dissected. Type locality: Fort Garland, Costillo County, Colorado. Hydnobius lobatus described from unique specimen which becomes the holotype, female (described as a male) in USNM; bearing white label “Manchester, Wash. / IV, 22, 1934”; red label “TYPE [male symbol] / Hydnobius / lobatus / 1935 – M.H. Hatch”; our white female symbol label; and our red holotype label; seen and dissected. Type locality: Manchester, WA. Additional material examined. We examined 294 specimens (See Appendix). Diagnosis. Body reddish brown, shining. Length of pronotum + elytra = 2.2–3.6 mm (males), 2.1–3.6 (females). Punctation of head fine and sparse, finer than pronotum. Pronotum widest near middle, sides obtusely rounded, basal angles obtuse; ratio length:width = 1:1.4; finely punctate with faint reticulate microsculpture. Elytra of medium length, wider than pronotum, ratio length:width = 1:0.7; stria 1 clearly impressed, remaining striae punctate, confused; interval punctures slightly smaller than strial punctures. Antennal club (Fig. 29) moderately broad, ratio club width:length = 1:2.7; width ratio of antennomeres 7:8:9 = 1.2:1:1.6. Mandibles (Fig. 30) moderately elongate; right mandible bidentate apically, with a median tooth on inner margin; left mandible with a tooth on apical one-half of inner margin. Profemur and mesofemur of both sexes unarmed. Male metafemur (Fig. 32) with a large tooth on posterior margin before apex; posterior margin basal to tooth may be irregularly serrulate; female metafemur unarmed. Both sexes with protibia widened apically; male protibial spur (Fig. 31) broad; mesotibia and metatibia moderately broad in both sexes. All tibiae, in both sexes, spinose on outer margin. Male. Aedeagus (Fig. 33) with median lobe broad, narrowing to small rounded lobe at apex. Parameres sinuate, concave medially at apex, with two apical setae. Internal sac apically with curved rows of broad, flat setae, and basally with a pair of sclerotized oblong lobes; lobes visible when internal sac is inverted. Female. Coxites (Fig. 35) elongate, cylindrical, with apical setae; styli minute, inserted at apices of coxites. Sternite 8 (Fig. 34) rounded apically; anterior apophysis broad, weakly rounded apically. Nomenclatural notes. Horn (1880: 281) placed H. longidens LeConte into synonymy under H. longulus LeConte, 1879: 511. However, LeConte described H. longulus from a mixed series which we recognize as Sogda obtusa (LeConte’s “ Type ”) and H. longidens (LeConte’s “ Type 2”). Horn’s action did not solve the problem of application of names. We have resolved this situation by placing H. longulus into synonymy under Sogda obtusa (LeConte, 1879). Our action of attaching names to actual specimens clarifies and stabilizes use of the names. Distribution. The species occurs across North America, from Yukon Territory to Quebec in the north and North Carolina through Arkansas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico to California in the south (Fig. 36). We have seen specimens from Canada: the provinces of British Colombia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, and Yukon Territory; USA: the states of Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah, Virginia, and West Virginia. Field notes and habitats. Most adults have been collected by flight intercept traps and evening sweeping or car netting, in deciduous forests, and infrequently in coniferous forests, or by litter sifting or at black light or in pitfall traps. Seasonality. Adults have been collected from January to September, with the greatest number in June.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→