MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968734539 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5987759

Gyrophaena fontanedai Enushchenko 2018, sp.n.

2018· article· en· W6968734539 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAedeagusParatypeHolotypeWhite (mutation)SparganosisDorsum

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Gyrophaena (s. str.) fontanedai Enushchenko, sp.n. (Figs. 6–10) Type material examined: Holotype: 1 ♂ [Specimen from was re-glued by me on white rectangular card; a plastic plate with a preparation of the aedeagus and abdominal segments VIII in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with specimen]: USA: ‘ALA[bama]: Shalby Co[unty]; | Helena 684B | I-3-1959 | leg. H.R. Steeves Jr.’, ‘CNHM 1962 | H.G. Steeves| Gen. Coleop. Colln. | Acc. Z–13, 050’ ‘Tree Hole’, ‘ HOLOTYPE | Gyrophaena | fontanedai sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ (FMNH). Paratypes: 1 ♂ [Specimen from was re-glued by me on white rectangular card; a plastic card with a preparation of the abdominal tergite VIII in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with specimen; aedeagus is lost]: ‘ U.S.A. Florida | Monroe Co[unty].; Lignum | Vitae Key. 14:III:1 968 | leg. S. Peck, Ber.: #109’, ‘FM(HD) #68-15, | Ber.: hardwood | forest litter. 28 lbs.’, ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | fontanedai sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ (FMNH); 1 ♂ [Specimen was cleaned and reglued by me on white rectangular card; a plastic card with a preparation of the abdominal tergite VIII and aedeagus in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with specimen]: ‘ Gyrophaena | breviuscula | Motch.[ulskiy] | Am.[erica] bor.[ealis]’ , ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | fontanedai sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ (ZMM). Description. Body red-yellow to red-brown; length 1.50 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 6. Antennae, mouthparts and legs yellow-red or red-brown. Body with distinct reticulate microsculpture, weaker on abdomen. Head almost twice as wide as long; vertex with small, sparse punctures; median area impunctate. Antennomeres IV and V as wide as long, quadrate to slightly elongate, antennomeres VI–X subquadrate to feebly transverse, apical antennomere flattened, conical, 1.5 times longer than wide. Pronotum 1.6 times as wide as long and 1.4 times as wide as head; microsculpture as that on head, with two median rows consisting of three small, shallow, weakly defined punctures; basal portion of pronotum impunctate. Elytra approximately as long as pronotum, almost twice as wide as long; with distinct reticulate microsculpture, surface covered by indistinct, small punctures and welldefined tubercles, most densely in the middle part and in the posterior margins of elytra. Male. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII with four teeth, with lateral pair rather stout and slightly curved inwards and medial pair blunt, equal to margin carinae (Fig. 9). Ventral plate of aedeagus long, widely curved latero-ventrally, with acute apex (Fig. 7); apical part of median lobe very short; dorsal projection of internal sac long but distinctly shorter than ventral plate, inclined to the ventral plate, slightly widening to apex. Female unknown. Comparative notes. Based on the morphological features both of habitus and aedeagus, G. fontanedai sp.n. differs from all known Nearctic species and is more similar to the Euro-asiatic G. nitidula (Gyllenhal 1810) and, especially by the distinct reticulate microsculpture of the body, shapes of antennomeres IV–IX and shape of the aedeagus to G. pseudonitidula Semenov 2015, described recently from the Chuvash Republic of Russia and known from a vast range extending from the European part of Russia to the Russian Far East (Semenov et al., 2015). From both these species, G. fontanedai sp.n. differs by the significantly smaller body (see the key below) and by the shape of elongated teeth on the apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII of male (these teeth in G. nitidula and G. pseudonitidula are significantly smaller). For illustrations of G. nitidula and G. pseudonitidula see Semenov et al. (2015: Figs. 2, 3). Etymology. The new species is dedicated to the Spanish shipwreck survivor Hernando de Escalante Fontaneda (1536–1575, dates uncertain) who lived among the Indians of Florida for 17 years. His memoir, written in 1575, is one of the most valuable contemporary contributions to the history and ethnography of the life of American Indians. Remarks. The specimen (paratype) with green label “Am. bor.” in the collection of V.I. Motschulsky (ZMM) were collected by him between November 1853 and March 1854, when he visited the USA (Krivokhatskiy, 2013). The specimen was noted by him as a “ G. breviuscula Motch. ”, but no description was published. The nitidula species group is erected here for this new and two above-mentioned species. This group is characterized by similar shape of the male tergite VIII and aedeagus (see the key below). Additionally, species of this group have long antennae with elongated antennomere V and subquadrate antennomeres VI–X; surface of head and pronotum moderately glossy, with well pronounced microsculpture; elytra with coarse and widely distributed punctures.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,038

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→Travaux en français237 207→