MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6968734539 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5987759

Gyrophaena fontanedai Enushchenko 2018, sp.n.

2018· article· en· W6968734539 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAedeagusParatypeHolotypeWhite (mutation)SparganosisDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gyrophaena (s. str.) fontanedai Enushchenko, sp.n. (Figs. 6–10) Type material examined: Holotype: 1 ♂ [Specimen from was re-glued by me on white rectangular card; a plastic plate with a preparation of the aedeagus and abdominal segments VIII in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with specimen]: USA: ‘ALA[bama]: Shalby Co[unty]; | Helena 684B | I-3-1959 | leg. H.R. Steeves Jr.’, ‘CNHM 1962 | H.G. Steeves| Gen. Coleop. Colln. | Acc. Z–13, 050’ ‘Tree Hole’, ‘ HOLOTYPE | Gyrophaena | fontanedai sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ (FMNH). Paratypes: 1 ♂ [Specimen from was re-glued by me on white rectangular card; a plastic card with a preparation of the abdominal tergite VIII in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with specimen; aedeagus is lost]: ‘ U.S.A. Florida | Monroe Co[unty].; Lignum | Vitae Key. 14:III:1 968 | leg. S. Peck, Ber.: #109’, ‘FM(HD) #68-15, | Ber.: hardwood | forest litter. 28 lbs.’, ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | fontanedai sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ (FMNH); 1 ♂ [Specimen was cleaned and reglued by me on white rectangular card; a plastic card with a preparation of the abdominal tergite VIII and aedeagus in Canada balsam was pinned under the card with specimen]: ‘ Gyrophaena | breviuscula | Motch.[ulskiy] | Am.[erica] bor.[ealis]’ , ‘ PARATYPE | Gyrophaena | fontanedai sp.n. | Enushchenko I.V. | 2018 des.’ (ZMM). Description. Body red-yellow to red-brown; length 1.50 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 6. Antennae, mouthparts and legs yellow-red or red-brown. Body with distinct reticulate microsculpture, weaker on abdomen. Head almost twice as wide as long; vertex with small, sparse punctures; median area impunctate. Antennomeres IV and V as wide as long, quadrate to slightly elongate, antennomeres VI–X subquadrate to feebly transverse, apical antennomere flattened, conical, 1.5 times longer than wide. Pronotum 1.6 times as wide as long and 1.4 times as wide as head; microsculpture as that on head, with two median rows consisting of three small, shallow, weakly defined punctures; basal portion of pronotum impunctate. Elytra approximately as long as pronotum, almost twice as wide as long; with distinct reticulate microsculpture, surface covered by indistinct, small punctures and welldefined tubercles, most densely in the middle part and in the posterior margins of elytra. Male. Apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII with four teeth, with lateral pair rather stout and slightly curved inwards and medial pair blunt, equal to margin carinae (Fig. 9). Ventral plate of aedeagus long, widely curved latero-ventrally, with acute apex (Fig. 7); apical part of median lobe very short; dorsal projection of internal sac long but distinctly shorter than ventral plate, inclined to the ventral plate, slightly widening to apex. Female unknown. Comparative notes. Based on the morphological features both of habitus and aedeagus, G. fontanedai sp.n. differs from all known Nearctic species and is more similar to the Euro-asiatic G. nitidula (Gyllenhal 1810) and, especially by the distinct reticulate microsculpture of the body, shapes of antennomeres IV–IX and shape of the aedeagus to G. pseudonitidula Semenov 2015, described recently from the Chuvash Republic of Russia and known from a vast range extending from the European part of Russia to the Russian Far East (Semenov et al., 2015). From both these species, G. fontanedai sp.n. differs by the significantly smaller body (see the key below) and by the shape of elongated teeth on the apical margin of abdominal tergite VIII of male (these teeth in G. nitidula and G. pseudonitidula are significantly smaller). For illustrations of G. nitidula and G. pseudonitidula see Semenov et al. (2015: Figs. 2, 3). Etymology. The new species is dedicated to the Spanish shipwreck survivor Hernando de Escalante Fontaneda (1536–1575, dates uncertain) who lived among the Indians of Florida for 17 years. His memoir, written in 1575, is one of the most valuable contemporary contributions to the history and ethnography of the life of American Indians. Remarks. The specimen (paratype) with green label “Am. bor.” in the collection of V.I. Motschulsky (ZMM) were collected by him between November 1853 and March 1854, when he visited the USA (Krivokhatskiy, 2013). The specimen was noted by him as a “ G. breviuscula Motch. ”, but no description was published. The nitidula species group is erected here for this new and two above-mentioned species. This group is characterized by similar shape of the male tergite VIII and aedeagus (see the key below). Additionally, species of this group have long antennae with elongated antennomere V and subquadrate antennomeres VI–X; surface of head and pronotum moderately glossy, with well pronounced microsculpture; elytra with coarse and widely distributed punctures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→