MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6968770064 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3812742

Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai Abdoli and Talebi 2019, sp. nov.

2019· article· en· W6968770064 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHolotypeApex (geometry)OvipositorArthropod mouthpartsGenusVeinAntenna (radio)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

<i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> Abdoli and Talebi sp. nov. (Figures 2 and 3) Type of Material <b>Holotype:</b> Female, Mazandaran Province, Noor, Chamestan, Tangehvaz (36° 21′ 55.68″ N, 52° 06′ 10.32″ E, 702 m a.s.l.), 05.ix.2011 (TMUC). Paratypes: 2 females, same data as Holotype (TMUC). Diagnosis The newly described species can be distinguished from all previously described species of the genus <i>Dolichogenidea</i> from the Palaearctic region by the following combination of characters: Antennal flagellomeres, all coxae and metafemur dark brown to black; tegula reddish yellow or yellow; pterostigma whitish yellow with brownish margin; propodeum with areola weakly defined by an impression; fore wing vein R 1 as long as or slightly longer than pterostigma; vein R 1 4.90× as long as distance of vein R 1 to vein 3RSb (Figure 3- A); T 1 more or less parallel- to subparallelsided i.e., slightly narrower medially; T1 smooth, with a distinct protuberance on central area; T1 length 1.70× posterior width; T2 smooth, transverse and rectangular; T 3 longer than T2 (Figure 2- F); hypopygium pointed apically and slightly protruding beyond apical tergites; ovipositor sheath with uniform width from base to apex and clearly longer than metatibia (Figure 2- E). <b>Description (Female-Holotype)</b> <b>Body Length without Ovipositor:</b> 2.50 mm, antennae length 2.60 mm and forewing length 2.60 mm <b>Head:</b> Antenna about as long as body; F 2, 3, 14, 15 length/width: 2.40, 2.40, 1.30 and 1.30, respectively; mouthparts not elongated (Figures 2-A and -B); head rounded or weakly constricted behind eyes (Figure 2- C); upper face (frons) smooth to rather finely punctate; gena, vertex and lower face (face) distinctly punctate; basal width of mandible 3.20–4.00× malar space length (Figure 2-A); OOL, OD, POL length: 0.13, 0.06 and 0.13 mm, respectively (Figure 2- C). <b>Mesosoma:</b> Anteromesoscutum densely punctate and setose, notauli indistinct; scutoscutellar suture narrow, distinctly crenulate; mesoscutellar disc finely and sparsely punctate to smooth and shiny; metanotum with uniform coarse wrinkles; anterior half of propodeum with few punctures and shiny, rest mostly smooth to slightly uneven; propodeum without distinct areola, weakly defined by an impression; pronotum weakly punctate; propleuron punctate; prepectal carina absent; mesopleuron medially smooth with some punctures on antero- and ventro-lateral parts; metapleuron weakly wrinkle to smooth, anteriodorsal corner rugulose, and with deep medial pit on anterior half (Figure 2-D). <b>Wings:</b> Forewing length 2.60 mm; Forewing length/width: 2.90; vein R1 as long as or slightly longer than pterostigma; Pterostigma length/width: 2.50; vein R1 4.90× as long as distance of vein R1 to vein 3RSb; vein r as long as or slightly longer than vein 2RS; vein 1-CUb slightly shorter than vein 1-CUa (Figure 3-A). <b>Legs:</b> Metafemur length/width: 3.60; length of metafemur, metatibial, metabasitarsus and sum of other metatarsal segments i.e., sum of segments 2, 3, 4 and 5: 0.75, 0.85, 0.40 and 0.60 mm, respectively; length of metatibial inner and outer spur 0.20 and 0.17 mm, respectively; metatibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length: 0.50. <b>Metasoma:</b> T1 more or less parallel- to subparallel-sided i.e. slightly narrower medially; T1 smooth, with a distinct central protuberance; T1 length 1.70× posterior width; T2 smooth, transverse and rectangular (T2 posterior width 2.75× its medial length); T3 longer than T2 (T3/T2 length: 1.25) (Figure 2-F); hypopygium pointed apically, slightly extending beyond the apex of metasoma; ovipositor sheath with uniform width and slightly curved downwards; ovipositor sheath clearly longer than metatibia (ovipositor sheath 1.20× as long as metatibia), ovipositor sheath length 1.15 mm (Figure 2-E). <b>Colouration:</b> Body black; except yellow or reddish yellow mouthparts, tegula, fore legs, apex of mesofemur, mesotibia, mesotarsus, basal one-third of metatibia and ovipositor; metatarsus brown; palpi whitish yellow; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin; wing venation with combination of whitish yellow and brown (Figures 2 and 3). <b>Male:</b> Unknown. <b>Note:</b> Although there is no available key that covers all Palaearctic species of <i>Dolichogenidea</i>, we provide comparisons of <i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> with all previous keys of Palaearctic <i>Dolichogenidea</i>. <i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> runs close to <i>D. britannica</i> (Wilkinson, 1941), in the keys by Nixon (1972) but it differs from the latter as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> T1 more or less parallel- to subparallel-sided not narrowed apically and ovipositor sheath 1.20× as long as metatibia (whereas in <i>D. britannicus</i> T1 markedly narrowed towards apex and ovipositor sheath twice as long as metatibia). This species runs into <i>D. jilinensis</i> Chen and Song (2004) [this species is synonymized with <i>D. purda</i> (Papp, 1977) by Liu <i>et al</i>. (2018)] as per the key by Chen and Song (2004), nevertheless, it differs from <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> T1 length 1.70× posterior width; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin; anterior half of propodeum with some punctures, shiny, other areas mostly smooth to slightly uneven, propodeum without distinct areola, weakly defined by an impression; notauli not defined (whereas in <i>D. purda,</i> T1 1.50× its posterior width, pterostigma evenly brown; propodeum mostly smooth, with only a small trace of posterior areola carinae near nucha, notauli distinct by crowded punctation). This species runs in the key by Liu <i>et al</i>. (2018) to <i>D. poliobrevis</i> Liu &amp; Chen, 2018, however, it differs from <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> T1 more or less parallel- to subparallel-sided i.e., slightly narrowermedially, T1 length 1.70× posterior width; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin; ovipositor sheath 1.20× as long as metatibia (whereas in <i>D. poliobrevis</i> T1 parallel-sided and as long as posterior width, pterostigma brown, ovipositor sheath nearly as long as metatibia). <i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is similar to <i>Dolichogenidea eleagnellae</i> Tobias, 1976, but it differs from <i>D. eleagnellae</i> as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> scutoscutellar suture narrowed with 20 crenulate; ovipositor sheath clearly longer than metatibia, 1.20× as long as metatibia; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin (whereas in <i>eleagnellae</i> scutoscutellar suture wide and deep with 10 crenulate; ovipositor sheath slightly longer than metatibia; pterostigma entirely dark i.e. opaque brown to blackish brown, without pale basal spot). <b>Paratypes:</b> F 2, 3, 14, 15 length/width: 2.40–2.70, 2.40–2.70, 1.16–1.30 and 1.20– 1.25, respectively; OOL,OD,POL length: 0.12, 0.05–0.06 and 0.13–0.15 mm, respectively; Forewing length: 2.70–2.75 mm; Forewing length/width: 2.90–3.00; Pterostigma length/width: 2.60–2.70; length of metafemur, metatibial, metabasitarsus and sum of other metatarsal segments: 071–0.75, 0.83–0.92, 0.41–0.42 and 0.60 mm, respectively. <b>Etymology:</b> The new species is named in the honor of Dr. Jose L. Fernandez-Triana, specialist on the systematics of Braconidae at the Canadian National Collection of Insects, for his significant contributions to the Microgastrinae knowledge of the world.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,637
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,962

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0840,039

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,189
Écart entre enseignants0,154 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyTravaux en français237 207