MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6968770064 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3812742

Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai Abdoli and Talebi 2019, sp. nov.

2019· article· en· W6968770064 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeApex (geometry)OvipositorArthropod mouthpartsGenusVeinAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> Abdoli and Talebi sp. nov. (Figures 2 and 3) Type of Material <b>Holotype:</b> Female, Mazandaran Province, Noor, Chamestan, Tangehvaz (36° 21′ 55.68″ N, 52° 06′ 10.32″ E, 702 m a.s.l.), 05.ix.2011 (TMUC). Paratypes: 2 females, same data as Holotype (TMUC). Diagnosis The newly described species can be distinguished from all previously described species of the genus <i>Dolichogenidea</i> from the Palaearctic region by the following combination of characters: Antennal flagellomeres, all coxae and metafemur dark brown to black; tegula reddish yellow or yellow; pterostigma whitish yellow with brownish margin; propodeum with areola weakly defined by an impression; fore wing vein R 1 as long as or slightly longer than pterostigma; vein R 1 4.90× as long as distance of vein R 1 to vein 3RSb (Figure 3- A); T 1 more or less parallel- to subparallelsided i.e., slightly narrower medially; T1 smooth, with a distinct protuberance on central area; T1 length 1.70× posterior width; T2 smooth, transverse and rectangular; T 3 longer than T2 (Figure 2- F); hypopygium pointed apically and slightly protruding beyond apical tergites; ovipositor sheath with uniform width from base to apex and clearly longer than metatibia (Figure 2- E). <b>Description (Female-Holotype)</b> <b>Body Length without Ovipositor:</b> 2.50 mm, antennae length 2.60 mm and forewing length 2.60 mm <b>Head:</b> Antenna about as long as body; F 2, 3, 14, 15 length/width: 2.40, 2.40, 1.30 and 1.30, respectively; mouthparts not elongated (Figures 2-A and -B); head rounded or weakly constricted behind eyes (Figure 2- C); upper face (frons) smooth to rather finely punctate; gena, vertex and lower face (face) distinctly punctate; basal width of mandible 3.20–4.00× malar space length (Figure 2-A); OOL, OD, POL length: 0.13, 0.06 and 0.13 mm, respectively (Figure 2- C). <b>Mesosoma:</b> Anteromesoscutum densely punctate and setose, notauli indistinct; scutoscutellar suture narrow, distinctly crenulate; mesoscutellar disc finely and sparsely punctate to smooth and shiny; metanotum with uniform coarse wrinkles; anterior half of propodeum with few punctures and shiny, rest mostly smooth to slightly uneven; propodeum without distinct areola, weakly defined by an impression; pronotum weakly punctate; propleuron punctate; prepectal carina absent; mesopleuron medially smooth with some punctures on antero- and ventro-lateral parts; metapleuron weakly wrinkle to smooth, anteriodorsal corner rugulose, and with deep medial pit on anterior half (Figure 2-D). <b>Wings:</b> Forewing length 2.60 mm; Forewing length/width: 2.90; vein R1 as long as or slightly longer than pterostigma; Pterostigma length/width: 2.50; vein R1 4.90× as long as distance of vein R1 to vein 3RSb; vein r as long as or slightly longer than vein 2RS; vein 1-CUb slightly shorter than vein 1-CUa (Figure 3-A). <b>Legs:</b> Metafemur length/width: 3.60; length of metafemur, metatibial, metabasitarsus and sum of other metatarsal segments i.e., sum of segments 2, 3, 4 and 5: 0.75, 0.85, 0.40 and 0.60 mm, respectively; length of metatibial inner and outer spur 0.20 and 0.17 mm, respectively; metatibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length: 0.50. <b>Metasoma:</b> T1 more or less parallel- to subparallel-sided i.e. slightly narrower medially; T1 smooth, with a distinct central protuberance; T1 length 1.70× posterior width; T2 smooth, transverse and rectangular (T2 posterior width 2.75× its medial length); T3 longer than T2 (T3/T2 length: 1.25) (Figure 2-F); hypopygium pointed apically, slightly extending beyond the apex of metasoma; ovipositor sheath with uniform width and slightly curved downwards; ovipositor sheath clearly longer than metatibia (ovipositor sheath 1.20× as long as metatibia), ovipositor sheath length 1.15 mm (Figure 2-E). <b>Colouration:</b> Body black; except yellow or reddish yellow mouthparts, tegula, fore legs, apex of mesofemur, mesotibia, mesotarsus, basal one-third of metatibia and ovipositor; metatarsus brown; palpi whitish yellow; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin; wing venation with combination of whitish yellow and brown (Figures 2 and 3). <b>Male:</b> Unknown. <b>Note:</b> Although there is no available key that covers all Palaearctic species of <i>Dolichogenidea</i>, we provide comparisons of <i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> with all previous keys of Palaearctic <i>Dolichogenidea</i>. <i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> runs close to <i>D. britannica</i> (Wilkinson, 1941), in the keys by Nixon (1972) but it differs from the latter as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> T1 more or less parallel- to subparallel-sided not narrowed apically and ovipositor sheath 1.20× as long as metatibia (whereas in <i>D. britannicus</i> T1 markedly narrowed towards apex and ovipositor sheath twice as long as metatibia). This species runs into <i>D. jilinensis</i> Chen and Song (2004) [this species is synonymized with <i>D. purda</i> (Papp, 1977) by Liu <i>et al</i>. (2018)] as per the key by Chen and Song (2004), nevertheless, it differs from <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> T1 length 1.70× posterior width; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin; anterior half of propodeum with some punctures, shiny, other areas mostly smooth to slightly uneven, propodeum without distinct areola, weakly defined by an impression; notauli not defined (whereas in <i>D. purda,</i> T1 1.50× its posterior width, pterostigma evenly brown; propodeum mostly smooth, with only a small trace of posterior areola carinae near nucha, notauli distinct by crowded punctation). This species runs in the key by Liu <i>et al</i>. (2018) to <i>D. poliobrevis</i> Liu &amp; Chen, 2018, however, it differs from <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> T1 more or less parallel- to subparallel-sided i.e., slightly narrowermedially, T1 length 1.70× posterior width; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin; ovipositor sheath 1.20× as long as metatibia (whereas in <i>D. poliobrevis</i> T1 parallel-sided and as long as posterior width, pterostigma brown, ovipositor sheath nearly as long as metatibia). <i>Dolichogenidea fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> is similar to <i>Dolichogenidea eleagnellae</i> Tobias, 1976, but it differs from <i>D. eleagnellae</i> as follows: in <i>D. fernandeztrianai</i> <b>sp. nov.</b> scutoscutellar suture narrowed with 20 crenulate; ovipositor sheath clearly longer than metatibia, 1.20× as long as metatibia; pterostigma whitish yellow, with brownish margin (whereas in <i>eleagnellae</i> scutoscutellar suture wide and deep with 10 crenulate; ovipositor sheath slightly longer than metatibia; pterostigma entirely dark i.e. opaque brown to blackish brown, without pale basal spot). <b>Paratypes:</b> F 2, 3, 14, 15 length/width: 2.40–2.70, 2.40–2.70, 1.16–1.30 and 1.20– 1.25, respectively; OOL,OD,POL length: 0.12, 0.05–0.06 and 0.13–0.15 mm, respectively; Forewing length: 2.70–2.75 mm; Forewing length/width: 2.90–3.00; Pterostigma length/width: 2.60–2.70; length of metafemur, metatibial, metabasitarsus and sum of other metatarsal segments: 071–0.75, 0.83–0.92, 0.41–0.42 and 0.60 mm, respectively. <b>Etymology:</b> The new species is named in the honor of Dr. Jose L. Fernandez-Triana, specialist on the systematics of Braconidae at the Canadian National Collection of Insects, for his significant contributions to the Microgastrinae knowledge of the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207