MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6969101441 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6277911

Cactophagus lingorum Anderson, new species

2002· article· en· W6969101441 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiquePaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRostrumScapePeduncle (anatomy)DorsumPremaxillaPedicel

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cactophagus lingorum Anderson, new species (Figs. 25­26, 29­32) Identification.—This species is recognized by its dorsal color pattern (Figs. 25­26), slen­ der form, densely pilose broadly carinate pygidium (Fig. 32), and virtually completely pilose and widely dilated third tarsal articles. This species has the superficial appearance of C. laetus (Erichson) but the latter has the intervals in the region of the subapical callus of the elytra distinctively modified, tumescent and merged, less extensive pilosity on the venter of the third tarsal articles, and an evenly convex pygidium. Description.— Male, not known. Female, length, 9.5­11.1 mm; width 3.3­3.7 mm. Color black except for pronotum with very broad orange maculation on each side of midline throughout length of pronotum, and small round lateromedian orange spot on flanks; elytra with pair of large orange maculations covering nearly entire disc with the exception of humerus, interval 10 and various lengths of the apical portions of intervals 1­9 which are black in an obliquely defined posterolateral area. Rostrum about three­quarters length pronotum; elongate, moderately robust, cylindrical and shining in apical one­half, evenly curved, moderately coarsely punctate laterally and dorsally at base, otherwise shallowly, finely punctate throughout; apical one­third glabrous and virtually impunctate; base of rostrum very slightly and gradually expanded, basal expanded area about one­fourth total rostral length. Rostrum glabrous ventrally; peduncle with slight to moderately developed anteriorly directed anterior tooth; bilamellate. Scrobe with posterior margin about twice width of base of scape from anterior margin of eyes. Antenna with scape about one­half length rostrum; club very slightly laterally compressed, elongate­oval; apical pilose part about two­fifths length of entire club. Pronotum with lateral margins subparallel in basal one-half, moderately convergent from midlength to apex; sparsely and shallowly punctate throughout; moderately deeply transversely impressed postmedially. Form of pronotum elongate-narrow, length slightly less than one and one-third times width. Elytra one and two-thirds times length pronotum; with striae vaguely punctate (moreso laterally) and intervals impunctate, flat. Scutellum elongate, narrow; length about one and one-half times width at base, flat. Pygidium broadly carinate in apical two-thirds, not tumescent; densely setose along low median carina and in apical one-third generally; punctate throughout; apex subacuminate. Ventrally with front coxae separated by about one-fifth to one-sixth width of coxa; prosternum flat between and anterior to front coxae. Mesosternum and lateral portions of metasternum and ventrites shallowly punctate; middle of metasternum and ventrites 1 and 2 virtually impunctate, shining; last ventrite of female flat at middle, apex deflexed ventrally. Legs moderately coarsely punctate and finely setose throughout; femora slightly clavate, moderately long and narrow, hind femur barely reaching apex of ventrite 4; inner margins of all tibiae with only very short, peglike setae arranged in pectinate manner; all tibiae straight. Tarsi each with third article very widely dilated, completely pilose ventrally except for very narrow midline at base; middle and hind tarsal third articles asymmetrical, inner lobe smaller than outer; apical margin of third articles truncate. Variation.The bright and distinctive pronotal and elytral patterns are consistently similar among specimens from the northern portion of Costa Rica. One tentatively conspecific specimen from Parque Internacional La Amistad Pacifico near the Panama border has a different color pattern but is otherwise identical in all other structural respects. In this specimen, the orange pronotal lines are much narrower and the elytra has less extensive orange maculations. The elytral maculations in this specimen are broadly "c­shaped" and resemble those of M. shchepaneki and M. circumdatus. Material Examined.—Female HOLOTYPE labelled “Est. La Casona, 1520m, / Res. Biol. Monteverde, / Prov. Punt. Costa Rica / N. Obando, Oct. 1991, / L­N­ 253250,449700”, INBio barcode 502152 (INBC). PARATYPES (4). COSTA RICA. ALAJUELA PROVINCE. Reserva Biologia San Ramon. Estacion Biologia San Ramon, San Ramon (27km.N., 8km.W.), 10°13’30”N, 84°35’30”W, 850­950m, 29.vi.­6vii.1999, R. Anderson, wet premontane forest, 99­108 (1). GUANACASTE PROVINCE. Estacion Pitilla, Santa Cecilia (9 km S.), 700m, Jun 1989 (1; 7694). PUNTARENAS PROV­ INCE. Monteverde, Estacion Biologia Monteverde, 10°18'53" N, 84°47'49" W, 1800m, 13.VI.2001, R. Anderson, cloud forest, on stems/roots of epiphytic Araceae (1). Santa Elena, Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve, 10°20'42" N, 84°47'53" W, 1650m, 11.VI.2001, R. Anderson, cloud forest (1). Paratypes in CMNC, INBC. An additional tentatively conspecific specimen, not a paratype, has been examined from Costa Rica, Limon, Parque Internacional La Amistad Pacifico, Refugio Valle de Silencios, 2400m, 341400N, 577250E, 18.IV.2001, Roger Gonzalez Tenorio (INBC). Distribution.— Costa Rica (Alajuela, Guanacaste, Puntarenas). Natural history.— Adult specimens were collected at 700­950 m in wet premontane evergreen forest, and at 1520 m, likely in upper montane evergreen forest or perhaps cloud forest. A single specimen was beaten from the roots and stems of epiphytic Araceae. The tentatively conspecific specimen from La Amistad Pacifico was collected at 2400 m. Derivation of specific name.— Through their support of the Nature Discovery Fund at the Canadian Museum of Nature, this species is named after the Ling family of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Frank Ling is presently Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Canadian Museum of Nature.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,028

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,155 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Même sujetPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→Travaux en français237 207→