MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6969101441 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6277911

Cactophagus lingorum Anderson, new species

2002· article· en· W6969101441 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRostrumScapePeduncle (anatomy)DorsumPremaxillaPedicel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cactophagus lingorum Anderson, new species (Figs. 25­26, 29­32) Identification.—This species is recognized by its dorsal color pattern (Figs. 25­26), slen­ der form, densely pilose broadly carinate pygidium (Fig. 32), and virtually completely pilose and widely dilated third tarsal articles. This species has the superficial appearance of C. laetus (Erichson) but the latter has the intervals in the region of the subapical callus of the elytra distinctively modified, tumescent and merged, less extensive pilosity on the venter of the third tarsal articles, and an evenly convex pygidium. Description.— Male, not known. Female, length, 9.5­11.1 mm; width 3.3­3.7 mm. Color black except for pronotum with very broad orange maculation on each side of midline throughout length of pronotum, and small round lateromedian orange spot on flanks; elytra with pair of large orange maculations covering nearly entire disc with the exception of humerus, interval 10 and various lengths of the apical portions of intervals 1­9 which are black in an obliquely defined posterolateral area. Rostrum about three­quarters length pronotum; elongate, moderately robust, cylindrical and shining in apical one­half, evenly curved, moderately coarsely punctate laterally and dorsally at base, otherwise shallowly, finely punctate throughout; apical one­third glabrous and virtually impunctate; base of rostrum very slightly and gradually expanded, basal expanded area about one­fourth total rostral length. Rostrum glabrous ventrally; peduncle with slight to moderately developed anteriorly directed anterior tooth; bilamellate. Scrobe with posterior margin about twice width of base of scape from anterior margin of eyes. Antenna with scape about one­half length rostrum; club very slightly laterally compressed, elongate­oval; apical pilose part about two­fifths length of entire club. Pronotum with lateral margins subparallel in basal one-half, moderately convergent from midlength to apex; sparsely and shallowly punctate throughout; moderately deeply transversely impressed postmedially. Form of pronotum elongate-narrow, length slightly less than one and one-third times width. Elytra one and two-thirds times length pronotum; with striae vaguely punctate (moreso laterally) and intervals impunctate, flat. Scutellum elongate, narrow; length about one and one-half times width at base, flat. Pygidium broadly carinate in apical two-thirds, not tumescent; densely setose along low median carina and in apical one-third generally; punctate throughout; apex subacuminate. Ventrally with front coxae separated by about one-fifth to one-sixth width of coxa; prosternum flat between and anterior to front coxae. Mesosternum and lateral portions of metasternum and ventrites shallowly punctate; middle of metasternum and ventrites 1 and 2 virtually impunctate, shining; last ventrite of female flat at middle, apex deflexed ventrally. Legs moderately coarsely punctate and finely setose throughout; femora slightly clavate, moderately long and narrow, hind femur barely reaching apex of ventrite 4; inner margins of all tibiae with only very short, peglike setae arranged in pectinate manner; all tibiae straight. Tarsi each with third article very widely dilated, completely pilose ventrally except for very narrow midline at base; middle and hind tarsal third articles asymmetrical, inner lobe smaller than outer; apical margin of third articles truncate. Variation.The bright and distinctive pronotal and elytral patterns are consistently similar among specimens from the northern portion of Costa Rica. One tentatively conspecific specimen from Parque Internacional La Amistad Pacifico near the Panama border has a different color pattern but is otherwise identical in all other structural respects. In this specimen, the orange pronotal lines are much narrower and the elytra has less extensive orange maculations. The elytral maculations in this specimen are broadly "c­shaped" and resemble those of M. shchepaneki and M. circumdatus. Material Examined.—Female HOLOTYPE labelled “Est. La Casona, 1520m, / Res. Biol. Monteverde, / Prov. Punt. Costa Rica / N. Obando, Oct. 1991, / L­N­ 253250,449700”, INBio barcode 502152 (INBC). PARATYPES (4). COSTA RICA. ALAJUELA PROVINCE. Reserva Biologia San Ramon. Estacion Biologia San Ramon, San Ramon (27km.N., 8km.W.), 10°13’30”N, 84°35’30”W, 850­950m, 29.vi.­6vii.1999, R. Anderson, wet premontane forest, 99­108 (1). GUANACASTE PROVINCE. Estacion Pitilla, Santa Cecilia (9 km S.), 700m, Jun 1989 (1; 7694). PUNTARENAS PROV­ INCE. Monteverde, Estacion Biologia Monteverde, 10°18'53" N, 84°47'49" W, 1800m, 13.VI.2001, R. Anderson, cloud forest, on stems/roots of epiphytic Araceae (1). Santa Elena, Santa Elena Cloud Forest Reserve, 10°20'42" N, 84°47'53" W, 1650m, 11.VI.2001, R. Anderson, cloud forest (1). Paratypes in CMNC, INBC. An additional tentatively conspecific specimen, not a paratype, has been examined from Costa Rica, Limon, Parque Internacional La Amistad Pacifico, Refugio Valle de Silencios, 2400m, 341400N, 577250E, 18.IV.2001, Roger Gonzalez Tenorio (INBC). Distribution.— Costa Rica (Alajuela, Guanacaste, Puntarenas). Natural history.— Adult specimens were collected at 700­950 m in wet premontane evergreen forest, and at 1520 m, likely in upper montane evergreen forest or perhaps cloud forest. A single specimen was beaten from the roots and stems of epiphytic Araceae. The tentatively conspecific specimen from La Amistad Pacifico was collected at 2400 m. Derivation of specific name.— Through their support of the Nature Discovery Fund at the Canadian Museum of Nature, this species is named after the Ling family of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Frank Ling is presently Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Canadian Museum of Nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology→French-language works237,207→