Hughes, Bill: my Navy recollections (October 31, 2008)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT: Rear Admiral Bill Hughes Hughes_B_0563_01.mp3 0:10 Introduction of interviewee and his career 4:50 First heard about Unification 5:20 Hellyer went to London and talked with staff college. "I thought he was a dreadful man." 6:07 "I was in sea jobs, most of the time. I didn't get involved with the terrible trauma that was going on mostly in NDHQ 6:27 NDHQ experience 6:45 "I got out of there very quickly." 7:06 First impression of 'Integration", not "Unification". Didn't mind the idea. 8:15 Discussions with others. 8:45 Pearson and resignation of Officers. 9:20 Resignation of Officers (Interviewee's wife enters and the recorder is paused) 9:45 Meeting in Halifax. Story about Adm Brodeur. 10:30 NDHQ, first experienced Unification "A complete disorganized shambles." 11:28 Problems with the HQ organization 11:47 Story about his rank as 'Colonel' in the Navy. 12:35 Analogy that if he wanted to destroy an Enemy Army he would implement Unification and have completed the task. 13:10 Public confusion. 13:20 Questions from all three messes "'Sir, why do we need to wear the green uniform when we are visiting aboard and nobody knows who we are.' They were ashamed to wear it ashore." 14:00 Passed this information in. Not believed? 14:08 Survey conducted. 14:40 "It was a very emotional thing to do, putting us all in green uniforms." "Unification was supposed to save us money. It didn't save us money at all. The way they saved money was by cutting DND budget." 15:15 Moral problems as well Army managed to maintain moral, because the maintained regimentals. 15:55 No Association with CF. "It's too big an organization; it's hard enough to associate with the army or the Navy." 16:30 First uniform issued. 18:00 Day to day job. Changed depending on job. The only time it really effected was while at NDHQ. 18:30 Doing experience not used to doing. 18:50 "civilianization" 19:03 "That was another mistake." Integrating CF and DND turned some minds. 20:05 Happened mostly at NDHQ and General staff level. 20:50 Resignation. 22:20 Senate Sub-Committee on Defence. 23:48 Unification in retrospect. "I went down to the Bahamas […] needed a clean break." 25:36 "Destined to be in the Navy". Unification was a problem "you know when you spend 38 years in something you get attached to it." 27:20 No financial saving from Unification. 27:40 No professional improvements. "Tended to dilute experiences." 28:32 NDC schools useful but not a solution. 30:22 "It's a very emotional subject." (Interviewee stood up and left the room. The recorder was shut off. Some pictures and albums where shown to the interviewer but unfortunately no pictures or copies were made.)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,102 | 0,041 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».