Additional file 1 of Time spent above optimal cerebral perfusion pressure is not associated with failure to improve in outcome in traumatic brain injury
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Additional file 1: Appendix A. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Alive/Dead and Favorable/Unfavorable at 1 month. Appendix B. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Alive/Dead and Favorable/Unfavorable at 3 months. Appendix C. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Alive/Dead and Favorable/Unfavorable at 6 months. Appendix D. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Improved/Not Improved (3–6 months). Appendix E. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Improved/Not Improved (1–3 months) with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix F. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Improved/Not Improved (3–6 months) with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix G. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Improved/Not Improved (1–6 months) with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix H. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Improved/Not Improved (1–3 months) with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix I. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Improved/Not Improved (3–6 months) with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix J. Mann–Whitney U/Chi-Square Testing of Physiologic and Demographic Data for Improved/Not Improved (1–6 months) with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix K. Histograms Comparing Improved and Not Improved Patients for % time with ΔCPPopt above/below 10 mmHg. Appendix L. Univariate Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures for Transition in Outcome with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix M. Univariate Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures for Transition in Outcome with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix N. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures + IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg for Transition in Outcome from 1 to 3 months. Appendix O. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures + IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg for Transition in Outcome from 3 to 6 months. Appendix P. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures + IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg for Transition in Outcome from 1 to 6 months. Appendix Q. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures + IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg for Transition in Outcome from 1 to 3 months with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix R. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures + IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg for Transition in Outcome from 3 to 6 months with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix S. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures + IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg for Transition in Outcome from 1 to 6 months with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix T. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures for Transition in Outcome from 1 to 3 months with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix U. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures for Transition in Outcome from 3 to 6 months with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix V. Multivariable Models of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures for Transition in Outcome from 1 to 6 months with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix W. Added Variance in Transition in Outcome of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures Over IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg with Those Who Died (GOSE = 1) Removed. Appendix X. Added Variance in Transition in Outcome of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Measures Over IMPACT Core ± CT ± ICP > 20 or 22 mmHg with Patients Trichotomized by Age. Appendix Y. Extended Discussion. Appendix Z. Graphical Illustration of the Relationships Between ICP and Cerebrovascular Reactivity
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,034 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,780 | 0,081 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».