Unsettled minds: reframing health and wellbeing in contemporary indigenous literatures
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis explores representations of health and wellbeing in Indigenous literature published between 1990 and 2019. With an awareness of how discourses of “healing” have been instrumentalised by settler colonial institutions in the twenty-first century, my work foregrounds the complexity, multiplicity, and agency with which states of health are depicted. Bringing the critical medical humanities and Indigenous studies into closer relation, I ask what can be gained by the analysis of Indigenous narratives of health within local cultural contexts and, consequently, what paradigms might be included within the critical medical humanities. I advance a trans-Indigenous methodology of “reframing”: reading Indigenous texts through culturally specific medical frameworks to combine current theoretical positions within Indigenous health policy and Indigenous literary criticism. Using holistic models of health – the Medicine Wheel, Te Whare Tapa Whā, and the Social and Emotional Wellbeing Framework – which incorporate relationships with Indigenous lands, communities, spiritualities, and languages, is crucial when understanding how Indigenous writers represent wellbeing. Considering texts through these frameworks reveals how they combine literary aesthetics with the cultural specificities of various Indigenous peoples, and how they are contextualised within larger structures of settler colonial histories and neoliberal health systems. This thesis analyses novels by seven Indigenous writers from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the United States. Chapter 1 introduces the three models of health with corresponding readings of novels by Thomas King, Witi Ihimaera, and Tara June Winch. Chapter 2 addresses the intergenerational aspects of Indigenous wellbeing through Indian residential school and Stolen Generations narratives by Robert Arthur Alexie and Alexis Wright, contextualised by the politicisation of “healing” in reconciliation discourse. Chapter 3 considers how the critical medical humanities might mitigate further pathologisation, drawing lessons from the literary revisions of the windigo figure by Louise Erdrich and Alan Duff’s depictions of whakamā. Chapter 4 analyses Indigenous speculative fiction, by Erdrich and Wright, that reimagines current health policies. Prompted by these literary “health futures”, I propose areas that would benefit from further collaboration between the critical medical humanities and Indigenous studies: biocolonialism, reproductive health, and environmental (or non-human) health. I conclude with accompanying reflections on the significance of completing this research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, this thesis contributes to the “critical turn” of the medical humanities – its recognition of the situatedness of medical culture, its fundamental critique of cultural pathologisation, and its navigation of cross-cultural scholarship – by presenting the possibilities and challenges that arise when engaging with Indigenous literary representations of health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle