Unsettled minds: reframing health and wellbeing in contemporary indigenous literatures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis explores representations of health and wellbeing in Indigenous literature published between 1990 and 2019. With an awareness of how discourses of “healing” have been instrumentalised by settler colonial institutions in the twenty-first century, my work foregrounds the complexity, multiplicity, and agency with which states of health are depicted. Bringing the critical medical humanities and Indigenous studies into closer relation, I ask what can be gained by the analysis of Indigenous narratives of health within local cultural contexts and, consequently, what paradigms might be included within the critical medical humanities. I advance a trans-Indigenous methodology of “reframing”: reading Indigenous texts through culturally specific medical frameworks to combine current theoretical positions within Indigenous health policy and Indigenous literary criticism. Using holistic models of health – the Medicine Wheel, Te Whare Tapa Whā, and the Social and Emotional Wellbeing Framework – which incorporate relationships with Indigenous lands, communities, spiritualities, and languages, is crucial when understanding how Indigenous writers represent wellbeing. Considering texts through these frameworks reveals how they combine literary aesthetics with the cultural specificities of various Indigenous peoples, and how they are contextualised within larger structures of settler colonial histories and neoliberal health systems. This thesis analyses novels by seven Indigenous writers from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Canada, and the United States. Chapter 1 introduces the three models of health with corresponding readings of novels by Thomas King, Witi Ihimaera, and Tara June Winch. Chapter 2 addresses the intergenerational aspects of Indigenous wellbeing through Indian residential school and Stolen Generations narratives by Robert Arthur Alexie and Alexis Wright, contextualised by the politicisation of “healing” in reconciliation discourse. Chapter 3 considers how the critical medical humanities might mitigate further pathologisation, drawing lessons from the literary revisions of the windigo figure by Louise Erdrich and Alan Duff’s depictions of whakamā. Chapter 4 analyses Indigenous speculative fiction, by Erdrich and Wright, that reimagines current health policies. Prompted by these literary “health futures”, I propose areas that would benefit from further collaboration between the critical medical humanities and Indigenous studies: biocolonialism, reproductive health, and environmental (or non-human) health. I conclude with accompanying reflections on the significance of completing this research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ultimately, this thesis contributes to the “critical turn” of the medical humanities – its recognition of the situatedness of medical culture, its fundamental critique of cultural pathologisation, and its navigation of cross-cultural scholarship – by presenting the possibilities and challenges that arise when engaging with Indigenous literary representations of health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it