Effects of combined genistein and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on male reproductive development and function
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Early life exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) is thought to contribute to reported declines in male reproductive potential and increased incidence of male reproductive abnormalities such as testicular cancer, crytorchidism and hypospadias. These aberrations, collectively termed testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS), are thought to arise from impaired development and reprogramming of progenitor cells during the developmentally sensitive fetal and neonatal windows. The hormonal dependence and developmental intricacy of the fetal period, in combination with a comparatively permeable fetal skin surface, minimal detoxifying capacity and lack of blood-testis barrier, make the developing gonads particularly sensitive to EDs capable of crossing the placenta. Although EDs have been extensively studied in the context of single high dose chemical exposures, few studies have examined the additive or synergistic effects of ED co-exposure during critical periods of development. In reality, humans and animals are exposed not to one, but a myriad of potentially harmful substances throughout their lifetimes. Two common early life exposures are those of genistein (GEN), a natural phytoestrogen found at high levels in soy based infant formula and other soy-derived products, and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a ubiquitous plasticizer used in the manufacturing of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastics. We hypothesized that in utero co-exposure to genistein and DEHP, at low doses relevant to human exposure could induce alterations in testis development different or potentially more harmful than exposure to a single chemical at the same dose. Such changes could lead to long term effects on fertility.Multiple rodent toxicological models demonstrated the ability of genistein and DEHP to present a long term male reproductive risk, acting in an additive or synergistic manner, below previously reported thresholds of toxicity, and involving different mechanisms of toxicity from perinatal ages through adulthood. Several vulnerable cell types were identified in perinatal and adult periods, along with potential mechanisms of toxicity.The present thesis challenges the long running doctrine of assessing chemical safety in the context of high dose, single exposure animal and cell based models. Results also highlight how short term studies may not be predictive of long term effects. The notion that these EDs do not follow classical dose-response effects with consistent mechanisms of toxicity from perinatal ages to adulthood further stresses the importance of assessing impacts across a range of doses during appropriate windows of exposure and at different ages. These are very pertinent concepts in the context of chemical risk assessment and the ability of regulatory agencies to determine safe exposure thresholds.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».