Effects of combined genistein and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate on male reproductive development and function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early life exposure to endocrine disruptors (EDs) is thought to contribute to reported declines in male reproductive potential and increased incidence of male reproductive abnormalities such as testicular cancer, crytorchidism and hypospadias. These aberrations, collectively termed testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS), are thought to arise from impaired development and reprogramming of progenitor cells during the developmentally sensitive fetal and neonatal windows. The hormonal dependence and developmental intricacy of the fetal period, in combination with a comparatively permeable fetal skin surface, minimal detoxifying capacity and lack of blood-testis barrier, make the developing gonads particularly sensitive to EDs capable of crossing the placenta. Although EDs have been extensively studied in the context of single high dose chemical exposures, few studies have examined the additive or synergistic effects of ED co-exposure during critical periods of development. In reality, humans and animals are exposed not to one, but a myriad of potentially harmful substances throughout their lifetimes. Two common early life exposures are those of genistein (GEN), a natural phytoestrogen found at high levels in soy based infant formula and other soy-derived products, and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), a ubiquitous plasticizer used in the manufacturing of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastics. We hypothesized that in utero co-exposure to genistein and DEHP, at low doses relevant to human exposure could induce alterations in testis development different or potentially more harmful than exposure to a single chemical at the same dose. Such changes could lead to long term effects on fertility.Multiple rodent toxicological models demonstrated the ability of genistein and DEHP to present a long term male reproductive risk, acting in an additive or synergistic manner, below previously reported thresholds of toxicity, and involving different mechanisms of toxicity from perinatal ages through adulthood. Several vulnerable cell types were identified in perinatal and adult periods, along with potential mechanisms of toxicity.The present thesis challenges the long running doctrine of assessing chemical safety in the context of high dose, single exposure animal and cell based models. Results also highlight how short term studies may not be predictive of long term effects. The notion that these EDs do not follow classical dose-response effects with consistent mechanisms of toxicity from perinatal ages to adulthood further stresses the importance of assessing impacts across a range of doses during appropriate windows of exposure and at different ages. These are very pertinent concepts in the context of chemical risk assessment and the ability of regulatory agencies to determine safe exposure thresholds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".