MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6982785849

JTE v11n1 – Full Issue

2011· other· en· W6982785849 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · 2011
Typeother
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePentecostalism and Christianity Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignTechnische Universiteit DelftLoughborough UniversityUniversity of AlbertaYork UniversityStrongIllinois State UniversityITEAIndiana State UniversityJohns Hopkins UniversityCentral Connecticut State UniversityUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of WaikatoUniversity of OxfordPurdue UniversityNorth Carolina State UniversitySociety for the History of TechnologyMathematical Association of AmericaVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUniversity of ChicagoOld Dominion UniversityMasdar Institute of Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésWorkforceRestructuringWork (physics)SurrenderCommissionNegotiation
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

3-bit jealous about how little time it took them to do background research for a paper they were writing compared to what I had to endure.I wanted them to use the library, just as I had been required to do.I guess it was sort of like the reasoning that football games are in a stadium, religious services are in a place of worship, and book research is done in a library.Even though I prided myself in embracing new technology and applying it, I had not really conceptualized the library beyond the bricks and mortar.I had thought of the Web and the physical library as useful, but somewhat dichotomous entities.Just as the transition away from fountain pens, slide rules, and handwriting caused a change in behavior on our part, so does the use of the Web as a scholarly resource.In the conventional library there is a tradition of control from several different fronts over the quality and nature of the volumes available.Publishers make decisions on the books they produce so that they maintain their market and carry on the reputation of the company in terms of accuracy and quality.Libraries purchase materials that are consistent with the interests and needs of the communities they serve and reflect those communities' mores.Popular magazines generally apply editorial standards to what they publish to maintain credibility among their readership and nurture subscriptions.Scholarly journals, such as the JTE, maintain quality and focus through the refereeing process.Alternatively, the Web is a totally uncontrolled storehouse of information.There are no restrictions to what is available.Though pornography on the Web is a popularly known problem, especially in educational circles, it goes far beyond that single issue.On the other hand, the Web is an awesomely wonderful resource.It is imperative that we not restrict students' use of Web references in an artificial or superficial manner.Rather, we must teach students to become wise and informed consumers of the information that is available to them in this era of decontrol.We must help them develop the new sense of responsibility that comes with the widespread availability of information.Though we have a long way to go before most of the information in the world is available electronically, it seems quite plausible that the day will arrive relatively soon.One way to assess the validity of information and extend our knowledge is through discourse with one another as members of a learning community.The pervasiveness of the Web and email has enabled us to shrink the world even further and to make it more personal at the same time.Beginning with this issue, each author has the option of including an email address in the byline of the article.Though this is not a new practice among scholarly journals, it is agreeably not yet widespread.It assuredly offers to us a unique way of nurturing the members of our learning community.And most certainly, the skills that we teach to our students in using the Web and email will last them a lifetime..

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,145
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1590,014

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,211
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVTechWorks (Virginia Tech)Même sujetPentecostalism and Christianity StudiesTravaux en français237 207