MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W6983134725

L'évaluation du système olfactif suite à un traumatisme craniocérébral léger (TCCL)

2020· dissertation· en· W6983134725 sur OpenAlexfundno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Mots-clésOlfactory bulbAnxietyAnosmiaOlfactory systemCribriform plateTraumatic brain injuryDepression (economics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the last two decades, several studies have revealed the presence of olfactory disorders (OD) following moderate and severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Specifically, previous authors have shown that, following a TBI, several patients had quantitative (hyposmia/anosmia) and qualitative (parosmia) loss of sense of smell in important proportions. For moderate and severe TBI, the presence of such disorders, following trauma, is usually due to a coup-contrecoup mechanism responsible for the shearing of olfactory nerves penetrating the cribriform plate or to contusions or secondary hemorrhages within the olfactory bulb and cortical olfactory areas. Since these types of TBI cause obvious lesions, it was relatively simple to understand the nature of such disorders as well as identify the patients at risk of developing olfactory losses. A close follow-up of these patients is necessary since different studies have demonstrated associations between OD following TBI and long-term development of mood (depression, anxiety). Patients developing OD following moderate to severe TBI exhibited more symptoms of anxiety and depression for several weeks following the trauma, when compared to patients without OD. On the other hand, there are only three studies that have investigated the presence of OD and their consequences in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), even though they represent nearly 85% of TBI. Moreover, due to the presence of several methodological flaws (choice of invalid evaluation tools, omission of a control group) a great heterogeneity regarding the proportion of mTBI patients who develop OD after the trauma, is found within the literature. So, the studies included in this thesis aim to give, with the establishment of a valid and controlled methodology, the very first idea of the proportion of patients with mTBI who will develop quantitative and qualitative OD. In addition, the predictive value of OD following mTBI on the development of anxiety and depressive symptoms and general health, is also covered in the manuscript. The first study aimed to assess the presence of olfactory disorders within the first 24 hours and one year after the mTBI. The results of this cross-sectional study demonstrated that, in the acute phase, more than half of the patients with mTBI exhibited a partial loss of their sense of smell (hyposmia). In fact, when compared to an orthopedic control group, the proportion of mTBI patients with OD following their accident was significantly higher. When evaluated one year after their mTBI, the patients did not have OD and no significant difference was found between control and mTBI groups. However, when comparing mTBI patients with OD (OD+) to those who did not present OD (OD-) at baseline, we found that OD+ mTBI patients reported significantly more anxiety and post-concussion symptoms, when evaluated one year following their trauma. The second study of this thesis aimed to deepen the results of the previous one, with the help of a larger group of patients, a longitudinal design as well as the implementation of new tools in order to evaluate a broader spectrum of post-concussive symptoms. In this study, olfaction and mood of patients with mTBI were evaluated 1 and 6 months following the trauma. The results show that, when compared to a group of control participants, a significantly high proportion of mTBI patients report a distortion of their olfaction (parosmia), 1 and 6 months following the trauma. In addition, the hierarchical regression analyzes indicate that, within the mTBI group, the presence of baseline parosmia significantly increases the value of the predictive model for the development of depression and anxiety. In conclusion, these two studies provided a much more accurate picture of the actual proportion of mTBI patients at risk of developing post-traumatic OD. Indeed, due to the numerous methodological controls applied, these results paint a more realistic portrait of the short and long term presence of OD following mTBI. Thus, these two projects have revealed alarming proportions, going far beyond what is recorded in the restricted literature available to date. In addition, it appears that baseline presence of qualitative OD following mTBI is a significant predictor of the development of symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,191
Écart entre enseignants0,177 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)→Même sujetPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→Travaux en français237 207→