MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6983134725

L'évaluation du système olfactif suite à un traumatisme craniocérébral léger (TCCL)

2020· dissertation· en· W6983134725 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
KeywordsOlfactory bulbAnxietyAnosmiaOlfactory systemCribriform plateTraumatic brain injuryDepression (economics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last two decades, several studies have revealed the presence of olfactory disorders (OD) following moderate and severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Specifically, previous authors have shown that, following a TBI, several patients had quantitative (hyposmia/anosmia) and qualitative (parosmia) loss of sense of smell in important proportions. For moderate and severe TBI, the presence of such disorders, following trauma, is usually due to a coup-contrecoup mechanism responsible for the shearing of olfactory nerves penetrating the cribriform plate or to contusions or secondary hemorrhages within the olfactory bulb and cortical olfactory areas. Since these types of TBI cause obvious lesions, it was relatively simple to understand the nature of such disorders as well as identify the patients at risk of developing olfactory losses. A close follow-up of these patients is necessary since different studies have demonstrated associations between OD following TBI and long-term development of mood (depression, anxiety). Patients developing OD following moderate to severe TBI exhibited more symptoms of anxiety and depression for several weeks following the trauma, when compared to patients without OD. On the other hand, there are only three studies that have investigated the presence of OD and their consequences in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), even though they represent nearly 85% of TBI. Moreover, due to the presence of several methodological flaws (choice of invalid evaluation tools, omission of a control group) a great heterogeneity regarding the proportion of mTBI patients who develop OD after the trauma, is found within the literature. So, the studies included in this thesis aim to give, with the establishment of a valid and controlled methodology, the very first idea of the proportion of patients with mTBI who will develop quantitative and qualitative OD. In addition, the predictive value of OD following mTBI on the development of anxiety and depressive symptoms and general health, is also covered in the manuscript. The first study aimed to assess the presence of olfactory disorders within the first 24 hours and one year after the mTBI. The results of this cross-sectional study demonstrated that, in the acute phase, more than half of the patients with mTBI exhibited a partial loss of their sense of smell (hyposmia). In fact, when compared to an orthopedic control group, the proportion of mTBI patients with OD following their accident was significantly higher. When evaluated one year after their mTBI, the patients did not have OD and no significant difference was found between control and mTBI groups. However, when comparing mTBI patients with OD (OD+) to those who did not present OD (OD-) at baseline, we found that OD+ mTBI patients reported significantly more anxiety and post-concussion symptoms, when evaluated one year following their trauma. The second study of this thesis aimed to deepen the results of the previous one, with the help of a larger group of patients, a longitudinal design as well as the implementation of new tools in order to evaluate a broader spectrum of post-concussive symptoms. In this study, olfaction and mood of patients with mTBI were evaluated 1 and 6 months following the trauma. The results show that, when compared to a group of control participants, a significantly high proportion of mTBI patients report a distortion of their olfaction (parosmia), 1 and 6 months following the trauma. In addition, the hierarchical regression analyzes indicate that, within the mTBI group, the presence of baseline parosmia significantly increases the value of the predictive model for the development of depression and anxiety. In conclusion, these two studies provided a much more accurate picture of the actual proportion of mTBI patients at risk of developing post-traumatic OD. Indeed, due to the numerous methodological controls applied, these results paint a more realistic portrait of the short and long term presence of OD following mTBI. Thus, these two projects have revealed alarming proportions, going far beyond what is recorded in the restricted literature available to date. In addition, it appears that baseline presence of qualitative OD following mTBI is a significant predictor of the development of symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePapyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→