Review of <i>A Seat at the Table: Huston Smith in Conversationwith Native Americans on Religious Freedom</i> ByHuston Smith
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
As Native American religious traditions have reached new visibility and vitality over the last forty years, it is clear that constitutionally protected religious liberty has not extended to Native American communities. This is no mere matter of a tragic past; it is of currency today as a human rights concern. Indeed, two landmark cases by which the Rehnquist Court shrank the reach of constitutional protection for religious minorities generally involved Peyote practices of the Native American Church and management of sacred sites on federal lands. A Seat at the Table explores the wide range of these contemporary issues, from protection of sacred lands like South Dakota's Bear Butte and Arizona's Mount Graham to sweat lodges in American prisons to endangered Native languages to the ethics of genomic research. But more than a series of case studies, the book is a testament to the firm resolve of contemporary Native communities to protect sacred places and practices against the odds. It presents a compelling dialogical glimpse into the distmctive religious worlds of various Native peoples as revealed by Native voices in contemporary struggles. Although a companion volume to a documentary film by the editor and the late Gary Rhine, the book stands alone as an important collection of conversations between Huston Smith, a senior scholar of comparative religions, and eleven prominent Native American spiritual leaders, advocates, and intellectuals, among them the late Vine Deloria Jr., Oren Lyons, Charlotte Black Elk, Winona LaDuke, and Walter Echo-Hawk. More than wooden interviews, the conversations are genuine exchanges, deepened by the wealth of Smith's comparative insights from religious studies and the compassionate rapport he clearly has with his interlocutors. If the Native voices are at times steered by Smith's questions, there is a manner in which these exchanges are closer to the ground of Native idioms of advocacy and expression than would, say, a collection of scholarly essays penned by the same participants. That the conversations were staged in sessions for the Third World's Parliament of Religions in Cape Town, South Africa, gives them a further sense of immediacy and shared purpose. Of particular interest to readers of Great Plains Quarterly will be the interviews with Charlotte Black Elk on sacred sites in the Black Hills/Paha Sapa and with Vine Deloria Jr. Less compelling in my view were editorial efforts to preface each interview and supplement it with scattered side-bar quotes by the likes of Geronimo and Chief Seattle: taken out of context these are more distracting than enriching. Still, the work of organizing and transcribing these conversations offers fresh, accessible, and important material to scholars, activists, and general interest readers alike on matters of great moment for Native communities today.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».