Police work experiences and their relationship to burnout and organizational citizenship behaviour
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recent police stress literature has consistently asserted that organizational aspects \nof work, rather than operational ones, are identified by officers as being the most \nstressful. Exposure to perceived workplace stress can culminate in burnout, a state of \ndiminished well-being and functionality. Although studied among police populations, no \nattempt has been made to examine the link between burnout and the perceptions of \nofficers regarding chronic exposure to both organizational and operational aspects of \npolice work. Positive perceptions of work experiences have also been found to influence \nemployee behaviour at work, specifically organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), \nextra-role discretionary behaviours that contribute to overall organizational efficiency. \nThe purpose of the present study was to examine the degree to which police officers \nappraised organizational and operational facets of work as stressful or uplifting, and to \ninvestigate the relationships among such appraisals and burnout and OCB, respectively. In \norder to do so within an integrated framework that addressed a conceptualization of stress \nas a process occurring within the person-environment nexus, the moderating effects of \ncoping style and personality were considered. Officers from the Thunder Bay Police \nService and the Northwest Region of the Ontario Provincial Police completed self-report \nmeasures of these variables. Whereas negative appraisals tended to depend on the \nfrequency of exposure to the different facets of work, potentially positive organizational \nexperiences were identified as being more uplifting than operational ones. Some evidence \nwas found for expected associations among appraisals of work, burnout, and OCB, with \norganizational hassles and uplifts being more strongly associated with burnout and OCB, \nrespectively, than operational ones. Some of the associations were moderated by \ndisposition and coping style, although not always in expected directions, supporting the \ncontention that chronic exposure to stress may impact on officer well-being over and \nabove third variable influences. The study highlighted the importance of considering both \npositive and negative appraisals of the working environment in the study of police stress, \nand the potential adaptive function of both problem-focused and emotion-focused coping.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».