Police work experiences and their relationship to burnout and organizational citizenship behaviour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent police stress literature has consistently asserted that organizational aspects \nof work, rather than operational ones, are identified by officers as being the most \nstressful. Exposure to perceived workplace stress can culminate in burnout, a state of \ndiminished well-being and functionality. Although studied among police populations, no \nattempt has been made to examine the link between burnout and the perceptions of \nofficers regarding chronic exposure to both organizational and operational aspects of \npolice work. Positive perceptions of work experiences have also been found to influence \nemployee behaviour at work, specifically organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB), \nextra-role discretionary behaviours that contribute to overall organizational efficiency. \nThe purpose of the present study was to examine the degree to which police officers \nappraised organizational and operational facets of work as stressful or uplifting, and to \ninvestigate the relationships among such appraisals and burnout and OCB, respectively. In \norder to do so within an integrated framework that addressed a conceptualization of stress \nas a process occurring within the person-environment nexus, the moderating effects of \ncoping style and personality were considered. Officers from the Thunder Bay Police \nService and the Northwest Region of the Ontario Provincial Police completed self-report \nmeasures of these variables. Whereas negative appraisals tended to depend on the \nfrequency of exposure to the different facets of work, potentially positive organizational \nexperiences were identified as being more uplifting than operational ones. Some evidence \nwas found for expected associations among appraisals of work, burnout, and OCB, with \norganizational hassles and uplifts being more strongly associated with burnout and OCB, \nrespectively, than operational ones. Some of the associations were moderated by \ndisposition and coping style, although not always in expected directions, supporting the \ncontention that chronic exposure to stress may impact on officer well-being over and \nabove third variable influences. The study highlighted the importance of considering both \npositive and negative appraisals of the working environment in the study of police stress, \nand the potential adaptive function of both problem-focused and emotion-focused coping.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".