MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7001026467

"How long does it take a ritual to build up, to take hold and become standard practice?" : bark peeling in Scandinavia and North America

2001· other· en· W7001026467 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton) · 2001
Typeother
Langueen
Domaine
Thématique
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBark (sound)CambiumTemperate climateEconomic shortageDeciduousTaiga
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Independently, the Sami people in northern Scandinavia and native people in the north temperate and boreal zone of North America have utilized the cambium layer of bark from both coniferous and deciduous trees as food, medicine, as well as material for other requirements; clothes, baskets and various kinds of wrapping. The sharp seasonal environments created food shortages in certain periods and inner bark thus became an important food component. Dating of bark scars indicates a slight difference between periods of bark use in Scandinavia and North America. The final cessation of inner bark use was dependent on an increased access to substitutive foodstuff as sugar and cereals, as well as authorities trying to prevent bark harvest. Cambium harvest was primarily a task for women, and sometimes children. Generally, bark was peeled in springtime, when the sap was "running", the proper time varying among tree species. During this period, the cambium had a comparatively high nutritional value and an appealing taste. Simultaneously, the supply of animal food/protein was generally low. Inner bark contains a relatively high amount of carbohydrates and healthy food fibers, as well as vitamins and essential minerals, making it a nutritional complement to protein rich food. Naturally, the tree species used for bark peeling differ in the areas described according to latitude and, consequently, bioclimatical zonation. The materials, as well as shaping of bark peeling tools were similar in northern Scandinavia and North America. In North America, there is an evident material transition from bones and antlers to metals, which occurred when trading with the white man began. The peoples described herein had a sacred relationship with nature, which meant that bark was not peeled all round the tree trunk. Therefore, avoiding girdling the tree and killing it. North and south were spiritually important directions to the Sami and consequently trees were primarily peeled to the north. Similar data is presented in survey material from Vancouver Island. However, indigenous people in North America likely had practical intentions when bark stripping a tree directionally. The shaded side had a better cambium taste as well as fewer branches. This side was often directed to the north. Occasionally, cambium was processed in cooking pits in both Scandinavia and North America, but it was an unusual phenomenon. In North America, these pits were primarily used for the processing of roots. Construction and function of cooking pits are similar. The heat generated in cooking pits breaks down large or complex carbohydrates into smaller, more digestible polymers, along with making food tissues less toxic. There is no clear distinction between food and emergency food. Due to some statements from Swedes as well as North Americans, bark cambium was emergency food. But, dating of scars reveals a regular use of bark. This fact points towards bark as a natural element of the diet. Although, bark use presumably increased during harsh periods when animal food was absent.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,657
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,273
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton)Travaux en français237 207