MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7001026467

"How long does it take a ritual to build up, to take hold and become standard practice?" : bark peeling in Scandinavia and North America

2001· other· en· W7001026467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton) · 2001
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBark (sound)CambiumTemperate climateEconomic shortageDeciduousTaiga
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Independently, the Sami people in northern Scandinavia and native people in the north temperate and boreal zone of North America have utilized the cambium layer of bark from both coniferous and deciduous trees as food, medicine, as well as material for other requirements; clothes, baskets and various kinds of wrapping. The sharp seasonal environments created food shortages in certain periods and inner bark thus became an important food component. Dating of bark scars indicates a slight difference between periods of bark use in Scandinavia and North America. The final cessation of inner bark use was dependent on an increased access to substitutive foodstuff as sugar and cereals, as well as authorities trying to prevent bark harvest. Cambium harvest was primarily a task for women, and sometimes children. Generally, bark was peeled in springtime, when the sap was "running", the proper time varying among tree species. During this period, the cambium had a comparatively high nutritional value and an appealing taste. Simultaneously, the supply of animal food/protein was generally low. Inner bark contains a relatively high amount of carbohydrates and healthy food fibers, as well as vitamins and essential minerals, making it a nutritional complement to protein rich food. Naturally, the tree species used for bark peeling differ in the areas described according to latitude and, consequently, bioclimatical zonation. The materials, as well as shaping of bark peeling tools were similar in northern Scandinavia and North America. In North America, there is an evident material transition from bones and antlers to metals, which occurred when trading with the white man began. The peoples described herein had a sacred relationship with nature, which meant that bark was not peeled all round the tree trunk. Therefore, avoiding girdling the tree and killing it. North and south were spiritually important directions to the Sami and consequently trees were primarily peeled to the north. Similar data is presented in survey material from Vancouver Island. However, indigenous people in North America likely had practical intentions when bark stripping a tree directionally. The shaded side had a better cambium taste as well as fewer branches. This side was often directed to the north. Occasionally, cambium was processed in cooking pits in both Scandinavia and North America, but it was an unusual phenomenon. In North America, these pits were primarily used for the processing of roots. Construction and function of cooking pits are similar. The heat generated in cooking pits breaks down large or complex carbohydrates into smaller, more digestible polymers, along with making food tissues less toxic. There is no clear distinction between food and emergency food. Due to some statements from Swedes as well as North Americans, bark cambium was emergency food. But, dating of scars reveals a regular use of bark. This fact points towards bark as a natural element of the diet. Although, bark use presumably increased during harsh periods when animal food was absent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton)French-language works237,207