Language Ideologies and Identities: Beliefs and Practices of College Level Spanish Students and an Instructor in a Spanish Heritage Language Classroom
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research on Heritage Language Learners (HLLs) began in the 1970s when the term heritage languages originated in Canada (Cummins, 2005); later in the 1990s, the subfield of heritage language education was created. HLLs are defined as “students who [are] raised in a home where a non-English language is spoken, who speak or at least understand the language, and who [are] in some degree bilingual in that language and English” (Valdés, 2001, p.38). From its inception, research on the education of HLLs has focused heavily on linguistic aspects (Beaudrie & Fairclough, 2012; Colombi & Alarcón, 1997; Potowski & Carreira, 2010), however, during the early part of the 21st century, interest in the sociocultural context(s) in which language learning as well as language use takes place has shifted research on minoritized languages and education to focus on the relationship between identities, power, and language learning (Achugar & Pessoa, 2009; Fuller & Leeman, 2020; Villa, 2002). Despite such interest, there is a dearth of qualitative studies on HLLs, language learning, and identities in general, and, more specifically, qualitative studies that center the voices and experiences of HLL students are at all but absent from the literature. Given the gap in the literature, this one-year qualitative study sought to understand how wider language ideologies influenced the identities of 22 Spanish Heritage Language Learners (SHLLs) and an instructor in a heritage language college course at a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) located on the U.S. - Mexico border. Drawing on a theoretical view of identities and identity formation as dynamic and contextual within and across social processes (Bucholtz & Hall, 2005) and the theoretical lens of coloniality/modernity (Mignolo, 2005 & 2012), findings highlight the particular ways in which dominant language ideologies intersected with SHLLs lived language experiences in schools and in their family lives to reflect the hegemonic dichotomization of standardized, academic language as an asset and heritage language as an obstacle. Findings also show how SHLLs suppressed their heritage language and identities by reproducing the wider dichotomization of languages that they encountered in their PreK-12 and higher educational experiences. The findings of this study have implications for post-secondary level policy and practice as well as for research related to textbooks and curriculum among SHLL college students.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».