Lake Mead National Recreation Area Monitoring and Evaluation of Sensitive Wildlife: Quarterly Progress Report, Period Ending March 31, 2007
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Project 1. Relict Leopard Frog Monitoring, Management, and Research Translocation field season has begun; eggs have been collected, tadpoles are being reared and some tadpoles have been released to an existing translocation site Egg mass surveys for the season have been completed Nocturnal surveys have begun Sampling for the amphibian chytrid fungus conducted at multiple sites Data transferal to County conducted this quarter A modified annual work plan and timeline was provided for delivery to the County All milestones and deliverables associated with the MSHCP project are on schedule \nProject 2. Bald Eagle Winter Monitoring and Evaluation Winter bald eagle count successfully conducted Data successfully transferred to County An updated timeline and work plan provided to transferal to County All MSHCP milestones and deliverables are on schedule \nProject 3. Peregrine Falcon Monitoring and Evaluation Extended monthly observations on resident peregrine falcon non-breeding activity at five territories was completed this quarter Peregrine falcon monitoring of 2009 breeding activities initiated A draft habitat suitability model has been used to guide exploratory surveys for previously unknown breeding areas, five additional breeding sites were identified Data associated with monitoring and preliminary habitat modeling and assessment has been organized, quality assured, and provide to NPS for transfer to the County The MSHCP projects are on schedule for all milestones and deliverables \nProject 4. Assessment of Six Covered and Three Evaluation Bird Species Data from 2008 intensive area surveys and habitat assessments transferred to County Thrasher habitat modeling nearing completion and we are working on the final report. Compilation of historical location data for targeted songbird species mostly completed this quarter. Field surveys initiated for targeted species at historical sites Project is on schedule for all associated MSHCP milestones and deliverable \nProject 5. Desert Tortoise Monitoring and Management. Efforts for this project have been completed under this task agreement (as modified) \nProject 6. Shorebird Monitoring on Lakes Mead and Mohave Twenty-four surveys were conducted at eight intensively monitored sites on Lakes Mead and Mohave Preliminary results were presented at two professional meetings \nProject 7. Desert Bighorn Sheep Habitat Use Monitoring in Relation to Highway Development. Data processing and field components completed for this project No efforts on this project were requested this quarter
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».