Lake Mead National Recreation Area Monitoring and Evaluation of Sensitive Wildlife: Quarterly Progress Report, Period Ending March 31, 2007
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Project 1. Relict Leopard Frog Monitoring, Management, and Research Translocation field season has begun; eggs have been collected, tadpoles are being reared and some tadpoles have been released to an existing translocation site Egg mass surveys for the season have been completed Nocturnal surveys have begun Sampling for the amphibian chytrid fungus conducted at multiple sites Data transferal to County conducted this quarter A modified annual work plan and timeline was provided for delivery to the County All milestones and deliverables associated with the MSHCP project are on schedule \nProject 2. Bald Eagle Winter Monitoring and Evaluation Winter bald eagle count successfully conducted Data successfully transferred to County An updated timeline and work plan provided to transferal to County All MSHCP milestones and deliverables are on schedule \nProject 3. Peregrine Falcon Monitoring and Evaluation Extended monthly observations on resident peregrine falcon non-breeding activity at five territories was completed this quarter Peregrine falcon monitoring of 2009 breeding activities initiated A draft habitat suitability model has been used to guide exploratory surveys for previously unknown breeding areas, five additional breeding sites were identified Data associated with monitoring and preliminary habitat modeling and assessment has been organized, quality assured, and provide to NPS for transfer to the County The MSHCP projects are on schedule for all milestones and deliverables \nProject 4. Assessment of Six Covered and Three Evaluation Bird Species Data from 2008 intensive area surveys and habitat assessments transferred to County Thrasher habitat modeling nearing completion and we are working on the final report. Compilation of historical location data for targeted songbird species mostly completed this quarter. Field surveys initiated for targeted species at historical sites Project is on schedule for all associated MSHCP milestones and deliverable \nProject 5. Desert Tortoise Monitoring and Management. Efforts for this project have been completed under this task agreement (as modified) \nProject 6. Shorebird Monitoring on Lakes Mead and Mohave Twenty-four surveys were conducted at eight intensively monitored sites on Lakes Mead and Mohave Preliminary results were presented at two professional meetings \nProject 7. Desert Bighorn Sheep Habitat Use Monitoring in Relation to Highway Development. Data processing and field components completed for this project No efforts on this project were requested this quarter
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".