PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENUMPANG PESAWAT ATAS KETERLAMBATAN ANGKUTAN UDARA INTERNASIONAL
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Article 1 Point 30 of Law No. 1 Year 2009 about flight describes the definition about the delay as the time difference between the departure or arrival time on scheduled and the departure or arrival time in the realization. In the case of flight delays on the transportation referred to Article 9 Letter a of the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 77 Year 2011, the carrier is responsible for the loss suffered by the passengers. The compensation that must be given by airlines to passengers has previously been regulated in the Article 36 of the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 25 Year 2008 about the Implementation of Air Transportation. While in international law, the responsibility of the flight delays has been regulated in the Article 19 of the Montreal Convention in 1999 about Convention for The Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air. These rules regulate that commercial air transportation is responsible for the loss suffered by passengers because of flight delays. Definitely, the carrier is not burdened with the responsibility if the flight delays happens for the safety of the passengers. However, in practice, such damages are often not implemented by the airlines. It certainly damages the passengers as the service users or consumers of the services provided by the airlines. For this reason, the researcher was interested in conducting this research with the problems of this research: 1) How was the Regulation of the Passenger Rights due to Flight Delays, 2) How was the Form of Legal Protection for the Passengers toward International Air Transportation Delays. The research methodology used was juridical normative through descriptive analysis. The results of this research showed that the passenger rights in Indonesian positive law contained in several legislations which were the Law No.1/2009 about Flight, Flight Ordinance 1939 or OPU 1939, the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 77/2011 about the Carrier Responsibilities of Air Transportation, the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 25/2008 about Providing Air Transportation, and the Law No.8/1999 about Consumer Protection. Meanwhile in international law, the legislations contained in Warsawa Convention 1929 and Montreal Convention 1999. That form of legal protections of the passengers could be classified into two groups which were before and after the delay occurred. The forms of protections before the delay occurred were supervision, founding and arrangement. Meanwhile the forms of legal protections after the delay were claim and insurance reimbursements, the lawsuit resolution either through the court or outside the court. In other hand, in the international legal aspects, the forms of legal protection for passengers could be seen from the form of legal responsibility used, the burden of verification and large nominal damages. Also, based on this research, it was hoped that there would be any specific rules regulating about the responsibility of the international air transportation and socialization and more government control optimized because it was frequently encountered many passengers who did not know their rights as consumer in the air transportation agreement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle