MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005062938

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENUMPANG PESAWAT ATAS KETERLAMBATAN ANGKUTAN UDARA INTERNASIONAL

2014· dissertation· en· W7005062938 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAndalas University eThesis (Andalas University) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDamagesConventionService (business)Compensation (psychology)AviationInternational lawService provider
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article 1 Point 30 of Law No. 1 Year 2009 about flight describes the definition about the delay as the time difference between the departure or arrival time on scheduled and the departure or arrival time in the realization. In the case of flight delays on the transportation referred to Article 9 Letter a of the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 77 Year 2011, the carrier is responsible for the loss suffered by the passengers. The compensation that must be given by airlines to passengers has previously been regulated in the Article 36 of the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 25 Year 2008 about the Implementation of Air Transportation. While in international law, the responsibility of the flight delays has been regulated in the Article 19 of the Montreal Convention in 1999 about Convention for The Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air. These rules regulate that commercial air transportation is responsible for the loss suffered by passengers because of flight delays. Definitely, the carrier is not burdened with the responsibility if the flight delays happens for the safety of the passengers. However, in practice, such damages are often not implemented by the airlines. It certainly damages the passengers as the service users or consumers of the services provided by the airlines. For this reason, the researcher was interested in conducting this research with the problems of this research: 1) How was the Regulation of the Passenger Rights due to Flight Delays, 2) How was the Form of Legal Protection for the Passengers toward International Air Transportation Delays. The research methodology used was juridical normative through descriptive analysis. The results of this research showed that the passenger rights in Indonesian positive law contained in several legislations which were the Law No.1/2009 about Flight, Flight Ordinance 1939 or OPU 1939, the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 77/2011 about the Carrier Responsibilities of Air Transportation, the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 25/2008 about Providing Air Transportation, and the Law No.8/1999 about Consumer Protection. Meanwhile in international law, the legislations contained in Warsawa Convention 1929 and Montreal Convention 1999. That form of legal protections of the passengers could be classified into two groups which were before and after the delay occurred. The forms of protections before the delay occurred were supervision, founding and arrangement. Meanwhile the forms of legal protections after the delay were claim and insurance reimbursements, the lawsuit resolution either through the court or outside the court. In other hand, in the international legal aspects, the forms of legal protection for passengers could be seen from the form of legal responsibility used, the burden of verification and large nominal damages. Also, based on this research, it was hoped that there would be any specific rules regulating about the responsibility of the international air transportation and socialization and more government control optimized because it was frequently encountered many passengers who did not know their rights as consumer in the air transportation agreement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAndalas University eThesis (Andalas University)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207