PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENUMPANG PESAWAT ATAS KETERLAMBATAN ANGKUTAN UDARA INTERNASIONAL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Article 1 Point 30 of Law No. 1 Year 2009 about flight describes the definition about the delay as the time difference between the departure or arrival time on scheduled and the departure or arrival time in the realization. In the case of flight delays on the transportation referred to Article 9 Letter a of the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 77 Year 2011, the carrier is responsible for the loss suffered by the passengers. The compensation that must be given by airlines to passengers has previously been regulated in the Article 36 of the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 25 Year 2008 about the Implementation of Air Transportation. While in international law, the responsibility of the flight delays has been regulated in the Article 19 of the Montreal Convention in 1999 about Convention for The Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air. These rules regulate that commercial air transportation is responsible for the loss suffered by passengers because of flight delays. Definitely, the carrier is not burdened with the responsibility if the flight delays happens for the safety of the passengers. However, in practice, such damages are often not implemented by the airlines. It certainly damages the passengers as the service users or consumers of the services provided by the airlines. For this reason, the researcher was interested in conducting this research with the problems of this research: 1) How was the Regulation of the Passenger Rights due to Flight Delays, 2) How was the Form of Legal Protection for the Passengers toward International Air Transportation Delays. The research methodology used was juridical normative through descriptive analysis. The results of this research showed that the passenger rights in Indonesian positive law contained in several legislations which were the Law No.1/2009 about Flight, Flight Ordinance 1939 or OPU 1939, the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 77/2011 about the Carrier Responsibilities of Air Transportation, the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation No. 25/2008 about Providing Air Transportation, and the Law No.8/1999 about Consumer Protection. Meanwhile in international law, the legislations contained in Warsawa Convention 1929 and Montreal Convention 1999. That form of legal protections of the passengers could be classified into two groups which were before and after the delay occurred. The forms of protections before the delay occurred were supervision, founding and arrangement. Meanwhile the forms of legal protections after the delay were claim and insurance reimbursements, the lawsuit resolution either through the court or outside the court. In other hand, in the international legal aspects, the forms of legal protection for passengers could be seen from the form of legal responsibility used, the burden of verification and large nominal damages. Also, based on this research, it was hoped that there would be any specific rules regulating about the responsibility of the international air transportation and socialization and more government control optimized because it was frequently encountered many passengers who did not know their rights as consumer in the air transportation agreement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it