“From Rome to Home” Reception of the Second Vatican Council through the Second Synod of the Diocese of London in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Bishop of London in Canada came home from the Second Vatican Council resolved to open up the teachings of the Council. His purpose was to bring the spirit of the Council into his diocese. His determination that the people understand the significance of the Council in their daily lives was a move towards reception. He had a vision of engaging the faithful and listening to them because he took their sense of the faith seriously. In this way his operative theology was inductive. His chosen vehicle for opening up the spirit of the Council was a diocesan synod. It was to be a synod which broke the mould. Everyone in the diocese, clergy and laity, was welcome to participate. The Bishop stipulated that every person in the synod had the right to speak on any subject. Nobody should feel left out. The purpose of the synod was to listen to the people of the diocese as they articulated their interpretation and demonstrated their reception of the Council’s teaching. Bishop Carter said that he was obliged to listen to the people because the Council had talked about the infallibility of the people of God. The Bishop held that the charisms of the people were undeniable and irreplaceable. Together, clergy and laity, they formed the listening people of God. Listening was necessary because the Spirit would speak where the Spirit chose to speak. This dissertation traces the organisation and prosecution of the synod over its lifespan of three and a half years, drawing on the archives of the Diocese of London. It demonstrates that the synod was a fruitful and meaningful procedure for receiving the Second Vatican Council in the diocese. The synod was especially effective because of its inductive methodological approach which allowed Bishop Carter to consult with the people of the diocese and for them to make their voices heard. The result was a new consciousness among the participants allowing them to live as church more effectively. Fifty years later this pioneering synod is now seen in conformity with the call of Pope Francis that synodality is what God expects of the Church.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».