SASKATCHEWAN HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ EXPERIENCES AND PERCEPTIONS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: AN INTERPRETIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The pressures of the global SARS-Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic overwhelmed healthcare systems and healthcare workforces around the world including those in the Canadian prairie province of Saskatchewan (SK). Heavy workload, chronic short staffing and feeling undervalued by leadership contributed to a perceived decrease in the overall mental and physical health and well-being, resilience and career intentions of healthcare providers (HCPs). This qualitative study was part of a larger convergent mixed methods study that sought to explore the mental health and well-being, resiliency and career intentions of HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic in SK. An interpretive descriptive research design was employed for this study and data were collected through semi‐structured interviews with 24 HCPs between May and August 2022. NVivo software was used to facilitate data management and data analysis was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis. The first theme identified was a Crushing situation of responsibility and circumstance. This theme detailed the level of responsibility shouldered by HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic and encompassed three subthemes including: Feeling undervalued in the workplace, Doing more with less and Hopelessness: No light at the end of the tunnel. The second overarching theme was that of Receiving mixed messages which focused on the participants experiences and perceptions of provincial and health authority decision-making, leadership and pandemic policies. This study found that SK HCPs perceived an overall decline in their sense of mental and physical well-being and resilience and the majority of participants expressed some form of turnover intention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants expressed a lack of confidence in healthcare and provincial leadership and explained that there was an inconsistent direction from leadership during the pandemic. Improved staffing and workload as well as enhanced leadership communication and support strategies were identified as solutions that could potentially help improve well-being, resilience and career intentions among SK HCPs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».