MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7005739002

SASKATCHEWAN HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ EXPERIENCES AND PERCEPTIONS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: AN INTERPRETIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDY

2025· article· en· W7005739002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic analysisFeelingMental healthHealth careStaffingReflexivityPsychological resilienceQualitative researchPerception
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pressures of the global SARS-Coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) pandemic overwhelmed healthcare systems and healthcare workforces around the world including those in the Canadian prairie province of Saskatchewan (SK). Heavy workload, chronic short staffing and feeling undervalued by leadership contributed to a perceived decrease in the overall mental and physical health and well-being, resilience and career intentions of healthcare providers (HCPs). This qualitative study was part of a larger convergent mixed methods study that sought to explore the mental health and well-being, resiliency and career intentions of HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic in SK. An interpretive descriptive research design was employed for this study and data were collected through semi‐structured interviews with 24 HCPs between May and August 2022. NVivo software was used to facilitate data management and data analysis was conducted using reflexive thematic analysis. The first theme identified was a Crushing situation of responsibility and circumstance. This theme detailed the level of responsibility shouldered by HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic and encompassed three subthemes including: Feeling undervalued in the workplace, Doing more with less and Hopelessness: No light at the end of the tunnel. The second overarching theme was that of Receiving mixed messages which focused on the participants experiences and perceptions of provincial and health authority decision-making, leadership and pandemic policies. This study found that SK HCPs perceived an overall decline in their sense of mental and physical well-being and resilience and the majority of participants expressed some form of turnover intention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants expressed a lack of confidence in healthcare and provincial leadership and explained that there was an inconsistent direction from leadership during the pandemic. Improved staffing and workload as well as enhanced leadership communication and support strategies were identified as solutions that could potentially help improve well-being, resilience and career intentions among SK HCPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207