Domesticating the Calendar: The Hours and the Almanac in Tudor England
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The printed almanacs of sixteenth-century England represent something of a challenge to historians. On the one hand it is clear that, in their own time, these publications were enormously popular and influential; but on the other hand their printed contents are so formulaic and repetitive as to appear almost empty of valuable information. Their most striking feature is the ubiquity of astrological terminology and information. This, together with the scale of their popularity, has led to their being considered in the past as ‘merely’ the repository of what was seen as popular superstition. The Victorian editors and cataloguers who did so much to make the contents of archives known to scholars tended to pass rapidly over the almanacs, and it was only in the first quarter of the twentieth century that one scholar took on the enormous task of cataloguing and discussing all the known and surviving versions of English almanacs up to the year 1600. This scholar, Eustace Bosanquet, also traced a brief history of their development in his introduction to a facsimile edition of Thomas Buckminster’s Prognostication for 1598. This brief narrative opens with the late fifteenth century enterprises of pioneer printers such as Wynkyn de Worde, who produced almanacs setting out the phases of the moon, and lists of dates of movable feasts, for up to twelve years at a time. As Bosanquet here points out, it was not until the second half of the sixteenth century that the concept of combining an almanac and prognostication, both calculated for the year immediately following publication, became standardized. This immediately raises questions about the relationship between the rise of the almanacs and the impact of both the new medium of print and of the Reformation; however, both of these are outside the scope of Bosanquet’s brief account. B. S. Capp, in his full-length study of English almanacs, published in 1979, still considers almanacs predominantly as illustrative of the public’s belief in, and fascination with, astrological prediction. The title of his monograph is Astrology and the Popular Press: English Almanacs 1500–1800 , and the first chapter, on ‘The Development of the Almanac’, focuses primarily on the history of the publication of astrological predictions in the late fifteenth century, and of how these were harnessed into highly popular annual publications which became, by the late sixteenth century, the familiar, annual ‘Almanac and Prognostication’.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».