MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W70065122 · doi:10.1017/9781846158575.003

Domesticating the Calendar: The Hours and the Almanac in Tudor England

2010· other· en· W70065122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Lawrence‐Mathers

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFifteenthPopularityHistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)TerminologyNarrativeSuperstitionClassicsArt historyLiteratureGenealogyArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The printed almanacs of sixteenth-century England represent something of a challenge to historians. On the one hand it is clear that, in their own time, these publications were enormously popular and influential; but on the other hand their printed contents are so formulaic and repetitive as to appear almost empty of valuable information. Their most striking feature is the ubiquity of astrological terminology and information. This, together with the scale of their popularity, has led to their being considered in the past as ‘merely’ the repository of what was seen as popular superstition. The Victorian editors and cataloguers who did so much to make the contents of archives known to scholars tended to pass rapidly over the almanacs, and it was only in the first quarter of the twentieth century that one scholar took on the enormous task of cataloguing and discussing all the known and surviving versions of English almanacs up to the year 1600. This scholar, Eustace Bosanquet, also traced a brief history of their development in his introduction to a facsimile edition of Thomas Buckminster’s Prognostication for 1598. This brief narrative opens with the late fifteenth century enterprises of pioneer printers such as Wynkyn de Worde, who produced almanacs setting out the phases of the moon, and lists of dates of movable feasts, for up to twelve years at a time. As Bosanquet here points out, it was not until the second half of the sixteenth century that the concept of combining an almanac and prognostication, both calculated for the year immediately following publication, became standardized. This immediately raises questions about the relationship between the rise of the almanacs and the impact of both the new medium of print and of the Reformation; however, both of these are outside the scope of Bosanquet’s brief account. B. S. Capp, in his full-length study of English almanacs, published in 1979, still considers almanacs predominantly as illustrative of the public’s belief in, and fascination with, astrological prediction. The title of his monograph is Astrology and the Popular Press: English Almanacs 1500–1800 , and the first chapter, on ‘The Development of the Almanac’, focuses primarily on the history of the publication of astrological predictions in the late fifteenth century, and of how these were harnessed into highly popular annual publications which became, by the late sixteenth century, the familiar, annual ‘Almanac and Prognostication’.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Astronomy and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207