Bio/Technology/Diversity News, Volume 4, Number 2 (1995)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Bio/Technology/Diversity News Produced by the Institute for Agriculture\nand Trade Policy February 15, 1995 Volume 4, Number 2 Code Number:\nNL95008 Size of Files: Text: 14K No associated graphics files\n_____________________________________________ HEADLINES\n_____________________________________________ - rBGH Opponents Mark\nOne-Year Anniversary This month, opponents of recombinant bovine growth\nhormone (rBGH) marked the one year anniversary of the lifting of a\nmoratorium on the product with demonstrations throughout the country. -\nFarm Couple Loses in 'Brown Bag' Seed Case The Asgrow seed company won\nits lawsuit against Iowa farmers Dennis and Becky Winterboer after the\nSupreme Court ruled in its favor. - DNAP Tomato Receives USDA Approval\nA second genetically engineered tomato received commercial approval\nfrom the USDA last month. - Upjohn Seeks Renewal of Seven GEO Permits\nThe Upjohn company has asked the USDA's Animal and Plant Health\nInspection Service (APHIS) to renew field testing permits for seven\ngenetically modified plants. - Administering PST Problematic -\nInternational News Roundup Canada's International Development Research\nCentre (IDRC) recently announced a project which will encourage the\ndevelopment of biotechnology in Latin America. - A Believer in Genetic\nDiversity Roger Lemstrom of Washington says upon his return from the\nVietnam War in 1978, gardening became a natural outlet for him. After a\nfriend gave him an heirloom variety of seed, he did research at his\nlocal library and discovered there were several thousand varieties of\nbeans. Since then, he has been involved in seed saving. - Monsanto\nSupports Biosafety Protocol The director of agricultural affairs at the\nMonsanto chemical company recently said his company supports a\nbiosafety protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).\nChester Dickerson said, "Clearly a biosafety protocol is needed; you\njust have to look to the United States. We think it's very important\nthat the public feel confident that the products they will be using in\na few years have been scrutinized by the scientists in the government,"\nhe said. _____________________________________________ NEWS SUMMARIES\n_____________________________________________ BIOTECHNOLOGY\n_____________________________________________ RESOURCES\n_____________________________________________ CALENDAR OF EVENTS\n_____________________________________________ Bio/Technology/Diversity\nNews is produced by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy and\nedited by Michelle Thom. Electronic mail versions are available free of\ncharge for subscribers. Fax/mail subscriptions are available at the\ncost of $30/six months; $50/year. For information about fax\nsubscriptions contact: IATP, 1313 Fifth Street SE, Suite 303,\nMinneapolis, MN 55414. For information on subscribing to this and other\nIATP news bulletins, send e-mail to: iatp- info@igc.apc.org. IATP\nprovides contract research services to a wide range of corporate and\nnot-for-profit organizations. For more information, contact Dale\nWiehoff at 612-379-5980, ext. 233, or send email to:\ndwiehoff@igc.apc.org.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,088 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».