Bio/Technology/Diversity News, Volume 4, Number 2 (1995)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bio/Technology/Diversity News Produced by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy February 15, 1995 Volume 4, Number 2 Code Number: NL95008 Size of Files: Text: 14K No associated graphics files _____________________________________________ HEADLINES _____________________________________________ - rBGH Opponents Mark One-Year Anniversary This month, opponents of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) marked the one year anniversary of the lifting of a moratorium on the product with demonstrations throughout the country. - Farm Couple Loses in 'Brown Bag' Seed Case The Asgrow seed company won its lawsuit against Iowa farmers Dennis and Becky Winterboer after the Supreme Court ruled in its favor. - DNAP Tomato Receives USDA Approval A second genetically engineered tomato received commercial approval from the USDA last month. - Upjohn Seeks Renewal of Seven GEO Permits The Upjohn company has asked the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) to renew field testing permits for seven genetically modified plants. - Administering PST Problematic - International News Roundup Canada's International Development Research Centre (IDRC) recently announced a project which will encourage the development of biotechnology in Latin America. - A Believer in Genetic Diversity Roger Lemstrom of Washington says upon his return from the Vietnam War in 1978, gardening became a natural outlet for him. After a friend gave him an heirloom variety of seed, he did research at his local library and discovered there were several thousand varieties of beans. Since then, he has been involved in seed saving. - Monsanto Supports Biosafety Protocol The director of agricultural affairs at the Monsanto chemical company recently said his company supports a biosafety protocol to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Chester Dickerson said, "Clearly a biosafety protocol is needed; you just have to look to the United States. We think it's very important that the public feel confident that the products they will be using in a few years have been scrutinized by the scientists in the government," he said. _____________________________________________ NEWS SUMMARIES _____________________________________________ BIOTECHNOLOGY _____________________________________________ RESOURCES _____________________________________________ CALENDAR OF EVENTS _____________________________________________ Bio/Technology/Diversity News is produced by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy and edited by Michelle Thom. Electronic mail versions are available free of charge for subscribers. Fax/mail subscriptions are available at the cost of $30/six months; $50/year. For information about fax subscriptions contact: IATP, 1313 Fifth Street SE, Suite 303, Minneapolis, MN 55414. For information on subscribing to this and other IATP news bulletins, send e-mail to: iatp- info@igc.apc.org. IATP provides contract research services to a wide range of corporate and not-for-profit organizations. For more information, contact Dale Wiehoff at 612-379-5980, ext. 233, or send email to: dwiehoff@igc.apc.org.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.317 | 0.292 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".