Conservation and Development: Pakistan Conservation Challenge
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The paradigm shift from 'patrimony' and 'historic monuments' -often connected to the historical documentation of the past on built heritage, which dominated the discourse and understanding of preservation in Eastern Europe --to the current complexities and understanding of 'cultural heritage', is only a recent phenomenon.In Eastern European countries, such as Romania, patrimony during communist regime was subjected to the national state's administration.Despite the recent political shift of 1989, state intervention in patrimony issues remains dominant.Yet, new ways of engaging with the material legacy of the past have emerged, once institutional reform took place and the 'heritage' discourse introduced.In the past years, particularly when referring to the communist past, much research gravitated to topics such as transitional justice, reassessing the history of communist regimes and discourses on memory, nostalgia and national identity shaping processes, such as memorialization and commemoration of the recent past.The purpose of this paper is to fill a gap in the field of heritage studies, and go beyond the discourse analysis on the intangible significance of what the communist past means today for the former communist Eastern European societies, specifically in Romania.That is, to go beyond how it is perceived and if, then interpreted, remembered or simply forgotten and ignored.Instead, I focus on how ideas (discourses) are transformed into actions and how, in particular, the Romanian society is actively dealing with the material presence of its Communist regime, and acting upon what is currently left from the tangible legacies of the Communist past.Hence, I am interested in identifying when, what, and under which circumstances the material legacy (meaning historical buildings) of the still highly debated and contested political regime is in the process of being identified, recognized and treated as heritage of the past and what implications/resonance these actions may have in the politics of preservation.More precisely, I am interested in taking an in depth look at the mechanisms involved in the process of creation of 'heritage' and assessment of the significance, value and meaning when specifically dealing with the material assets of the communist past.One central problem to be discussed is the method by which historical assets are negotiated and constructed as culturally valuable and how are Conference Proceedings The Right to [World] Heritage, BTU Cottbus -Senftenberg 2014 10 they being incorporated, perceived, and preserved as components of the national cultural heritage.Following, a brief theoretical review of the currently dominant discourse on mechanisms of value creation in the field of cultural heritage will be introduced.Then I will focus my attention on the case study, which aims to highlight the current specificities and difficulties in engaging with the material legacy of the Communist past in Romania.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,017 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».