Conservation and Development: Pakistan Conservation Challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paradigm shift from 'patrimony' and 'historic monuments' -often connected to the historical documentation of the past on built heritage, which dominated the discourse and understanding of preservation in Eastern Europe --to the current complexities and understanding of 'cultural heritage', is only a recent phenomenon.In Eastern European countries, such as Romania, patrimony during communist regime was subjected to the national state's administration.Despite the recent political shift of 1989, state intervention in patrimony issues remains dominant.Yet, new ways of engaging with the material legacy of the past have emerged, once institutional reform took place and the 'heritage' discourse introduced.In the past years, particularly when referring to the communist past, much research gravitated to topics such as transitional justice, reassessing the history of communist regimes and discourses on memory, nostalgia and national identity shaping processes, such as memorialization and commemoration of the recent past.The purpose of this paper is to fill a gap in the field of heritage studies, and go beyond the discourse analysis on the intangible significance of what the communist past means today for the former communist Eastern European societies, specifically in Romania.That is, to go beyond how it is perceived and if, then interpreted, remembered or simply forgotten and ignored.Instead, I focus on how ideas (discourses) are transformed into actions and how, in particular, the Romanian society is actively dealing with the material presence of its Communist regime, and acting upon what is currently left from the tangible legacies of the Communist past.Hence, I am interested in identifying when, what, and under which circumstances the material legacy (meaning historical buildings) of the still highly debated and contested political regime is in the process of being identified, recognized and treated as heritage of the past and what implications/resonance these actions may have in the politics of preservation.More precisely, I am interested in taking an in depth look at the mechanisms involved in the process of creation of 'heritage' and assessment of the significance, value and meaning when specifically dealing with the material assets of the communist past.One central problem to be discussed is the method by which historical assets are negotiated and constructed as culturally valuable and how are Conference Proceedings The Right to [World] Heritage, BTU Cottbus -Senftenberg 2014 10 they being incorporated, perceived, and preserved as components of the national cultural heritage.Following, a brief theoretical review of the currently dominant discourse on mechanisms of value creation in the field of cultural heritage will be introduced.Then I will focus my attention on the case study, which aims to highlight the current specificities and difficulties in engaging with the material legacy of the Communist past in Romania.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".