Crossing the Gender Barrier - A History of Male Nurses in Manitoba, Canada, 1960-1980
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper, Crossing the Gender Barrier - a History of Male Nurses in Manitoba, Canada, will examine the role of men in a female-dominated profession. There is a distinct lack of historical writing on male nurses. Nursing historiography has generally focused on the women who constitute the majority of nurses. Indeed, much of the literature comes from within the nursing profession and the field of sociology, most of which lack an historical emphasis. The development of the modem healthcare system is important to this work as it illustrates the evolution of the gender constructs that determined that physicians were male and nurses were female. Men were essentially absent from the profession until after the Second World War when they were heralded as a solution to the nursing shortage that had developed during the war years. Although previous restrictions limiting their access to nurses training programs diminished, few men chose a nursing career. It was not until the 1960’s and 1970’s that men, albeit in small numbers, began to train as nurses. In accordance with the growing body of literature on nursing history, which reflects new studies in gender analysis, this thesis will examine the role of men in nursing, particularly that “pioneer generation” of male nurses who chose a nursing career in the 1960’s and 1970’s when there were few male nurses. To examine the experiences of these men a variety of methods will be employed. Secondary literature, primarily from within nursing and sociology, which has examined the role of men in nursing will also be tested. This thesis also will utilize traditional source materials such as nursing school records, school yearbooks, and newspaper sources. In order to balance these sources, oral histories with several of the male nurses who trained in or worked at the St. B m face General Hospital School of Nursing in Winnipeg, Canada, in the 1960’s and 1970’s will be used to examine the motivations of these men in their choice of a nursing career and their experiences as minority members of a female-dominated occupation. This research demonstrates that these men chose their career primarily because they enjoyed working with people and wanted to help others. In addition to this altruistic motivation, there is further evidence that they considered nursing to be a well-respected occupation, which offered significant career opportunity. There were few male nurses at the time, yet these men reported good relationships with their female colleagues, patients, and physicians. Although these men were challenging certain gender constructs, it is evident that th~y were subject to societal definitions of masculinity - notably the need for breadwinner wages. Without exception these men were all very successful in their professional lives, achieving positions in administration, education, and labor relations. Despite their historical absence from nursing, as men gain a greater presence in the profession, they are increasingly assuming positions of power and prestige.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,042 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».