From Military to Civilian Primary Care: A Study of Veteran Transition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Military-to-civilian transition (MCT) is generally understood as the process of leaving military service and transitioning to civilian life. Each year, approximately 5000 Regular Force Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members leave the military. During service, CAF members access the military health care system and, after release, must transition to provincial/territorial primary care. Since Veterans experience health problems at greater proportions and use primary care more than the general population, this is an important aspect of MCT. However, no research has investigated Canadian Veterans’ experience of transitioning from the military to the civilian primary care system or how primary care is provided to Veterans. \nObjectives: To understand the transition from the military to the civilian primary care system and to understand how interprofessional primary care is provided to Veterans in the civilian system. \nMethods: Three studies were conducted to address these objectives. First, a phenomenological analysis of previously collected qualitative data from CAF members with an upcoming release. Second, a phenomenological study conducted with Veterans after release. Third, a single mixed-methods exploratory case study focusing on how team-based primary care is provided to Veterans. \nResults: The transition to civilian primary care encompasses anticipation of and preparation for the change in primary care provider (PCP) before the release date, making the leap from military to civilian primary care in the months and years that follow the release date, and eventual landing in the care of a primary care team in the civilian system. Many participants were able to make the transition to civilian primary care with relative ease. However, for those with ongoing health issues requiring consistent access to care, the transition was challenging and had implications for health and well-being. The interprofessional primary care team examined in the case study revealed the importance of Veteran-friendly and culturally competent primary care. \nConclusion: The transition to civilian primary care, like MCT more broadly, is complex and variable; continuous access to primary care throughout the transition is important. More research is needed to better understand this underexplored aspect of MCT to better serve transitioning Veterans in the future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».