MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7011572626

From Military to Civilian Primary Care: A Study of Veteran Transition

2022· dissertation· en· W7011572626 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)PopulationPrimary careService (business)Circumstantial evidence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Military-to-civilian transition (MCT) is generally understood as the process of leaving military service and transitioning to civilian life. Each year, approximately 5000 Regular Force Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) members leave the military. During service, CAF members access the military health care system and, after release, must transition to provincial/territorial primary care. Since Veterans experience health problems at greater proportions and use primary care more than the general population, this is an important aspect of MCT. However, no research has investigated Canadian Veterans’ experience of transitioning from the military to the civilian primary care system or how primary care is provided to Veterans. Objectives: To understand the transition from the military to the civilian primary care system and to understand how interprofessional primary care is provided to Veterans in the civilian system. Methods: Three studies were conducted to address these objectives. First, a phenomenological analysis of previously collected qualitative data from CAF members with an upcoming release. Second, a phenomenological study conducted with Veterans after release. Third, a single mixed-methods exploratory case study focusing on how team-based primary care is provided to Veterans. Results: The transition to civilian primary care encompasses anticipation of and preparation for the change in primary care provider (PCP) before the release date, making the leap from military to civilian primary care in the months and years that follow the release date, and eventual landing in the care of a primary care team in the civilian system. Many participants were able to make the transition to civilian primary care with relative ease. However, for those with ongoing health issues requiring consistent access to care, the transition was challenging and had implications for health and well-being. The interprofessional primary care team examined in the case study revealed the importance of Veteran-friendly and culturally competent primary care. Conclusion: The transition to civilian primary care, like MCT more broadly, is complex and variable; continuous access to primary care throughout the transition is important. More research is needed to better understand this underexplored aspect of MCT to better serve transitioning Veterans in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.170
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0140.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207