Osgoode Faculty Council Condemns Trinity Western University Law School “Covenant”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Osgoode Faculty Council Condemns Trinity Western University Law School “Covenant”\nTORONTO, February 11, 2014 – Faculty Council at Osgoode Hall Law School of York University has passed a motion, with near-unanimous support, calling on Trinity Western University (TWU) to eliminate language from its Community Covenant Agreement that discriminates against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) students, faculty, and staff.\n"The Osgoode motion reaffirms the School's commitment to promoting diversity and equality in the learning environment and its ongoing efforts to achieve improvements on these goals in the professional community," said Professor Mary Jane Mossman, the mover of the motion. "In the past, the legal profession has excluded individuals based on gender, race, religion or ableness. In 2014, it would be profoundly regressive to institutionalize such exclusion in a law school's policy."\nIn passing its motion yesterday, Osgoode joins a chorus of organizations that have raised concerns about the appropriateness of the TWU environment for legal education and the disproportionate pathways into legal practice for those targeted by TWU's Covenant. Law schools at three other universities have passed similar motions, and law faculty in Alberta have written their law society with concerns. Other organizations that have spoken on the issue include the Canadian Council of Law Deans, the Canadian Bar Association, the Canadian Federation of Students, the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers, LEAF, law school student governments, and law school LGBTQ groups.\n"The motion passed by Osgoode Faculty Council speaks to the value Osgoode places in building a more inclusive, representative learning environment and legal profession," said Osgoode student Douglas Judson, seconder of the motion. "It not only calls on TWU to retract its policies, but institutes ameliorative measures tied to the themes of the TWU discussion - sexual orientation, religious freedom, and human rights."\nAs part of the motion, Osgoode Faculty Council also agreed to make its best efforts to establish financial allotments to be awarded annually: one prize for the best essay about law, sexual orientation/identity, and human rights/equality; another for the best essay about law, religion and human rights/equality; and a bursary or scholarship for an LGBTQ student in financial need.\nThe Chair of Faculty Council will forward a copy of the motion to the President of Trinity Western University, and the motion will be widely circulated to law schools and other organizations, including the Federation of Law Societies and the Law Society of Upper Canada.\nTWU is a private, faith-based university seeking to open a fully-accredited law school. Incoming students and faculty at TWU must sign a "Community Covenant Agreement," which requires the signatory to abstain from “sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman.” The TWU Student Handbook states that students who do not comply with the agreement may be removed from the university without readmission.\nLast year, the BC government approved the degree-granting program. The Federation of Law Societies of Canada recommended that provincial law societies grant approval to TWU. Since that time, law schools across Canada have registered their concerns about the integrity of a program of legal education at an institution that openly discriminates on a protected ground, such as sexual orientation.\n-30-\nYork University is helping to shape the global thinkers and thinking that will define tomorrow. York U’s unwavering commitment to excellence reflects a rich diversity of perspectives and a strong sense of social responsibility that sets us apart. A York U degree empowers graduates to thrive in the world and achieve their life goals through a rigorous academic foundation balanced by real-world experiential education. As a globally recognized research centre, York U is fully engaged in the critical discussions that lead to innovative solutions to the most pressing local and global social challenges. York U’s 11 faculties and 27 research centres are thinking bigger, broader and more globally, partnering with 288 leading universities worldwide. York U's community is strong − 55,000 students, 7,000 faculty and staff, and more than 250,000 alumni. Media Contact: Virginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,019 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,011 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,221 | 0,037 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».