Osgoode Faculty Council Condemns Trinity Western University Law School “Covenant”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osgoode Faculty Council Condemns Trinity Western University Law School “Covenant”\nTORONTO, February 11, 2014 – Faculty Council at Osgoode Hall Law School of York University has passed a motion, with near-unanimous support, calling on Trinity Western University (TWU) to eliminate language from its Community Covenant Agreement that discriminates against lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) students, faculty, and staff.\n"The Osgoode motion reaffirms the School's commitment to promoting diversity and equality in the learning environment and its ongoing efforts to achieve improvements on these goals in the professional community," said Professor Mary Jane Mossman, the mover of the motion. "In the past, the legal profession has excluded individuals based on gender, race, religion or ableness. In 2014, it would be profoundly regressive to institutionalize such exclusion in a law school's policy."\nIn passing its motion yesterday, Osgoode joins a chorus of organizations that have raised concerns about the appropriateness of the TWU environment for legal education and the disproportionate pathways into legal practice for those targeted by TWU's Covenant. Law schools at three other universities have passed similar motions, and law faculty in Alberta have written their law society with concerns. Other organizations that have spoken on the issue include the Canadian Council of Law Deans, the Canadian Bar Association, the Canadian Federation of Students, the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers, LEAF, law school student governments, and law school LGBTQ groups.\n"The motion passed by Osgoode Faculty Council speaks to the value Osgoode places in building a more inclusive, representative learning environment and legal profession," said Osgoode student Douglas Judson, seconder of the motion. "It not only calls on TWU to retract its policies, but institutes ameliorative measures tied to the themes of the TWU discussion - sexual orientation, religious freedom, and human rights."\nAs part of the motion, Osgoode Faculty Council also agreed to make its best efforts to establish financial allotments to be awarded annually: one prize for the best essay about law, sexual orientation/identity, and human rights/equality; another for the best essay about law, religion and human rights/equality; and a bursary or scholarship for an LGBTQ student in financial need.\nThe Chair of Faculty Council will forward a copy of the motion to the President of Trinity Western University, and the motion will be widely circulated to law schools and other organizations, including the Federation of Law Societies and the Law Society of Upper Canada.\nTWU is a private, faith-based university seeking to open a fully-accredited law school. Incoming students and faculty at TWU must sign a "Community Covenant Agreement," which requires the signatory to abstain from “sexual intimacy that violates the sacredness of marriage between a man and a woman.” The TWU Student Handbook states that students who do not comply with the agreement may be removed from the university without readmission.\nLast year, the BC government approved the degree-granting program. The Federation of Law Societies of Canada recommended that provincial law societies grant approval to TWU. Since that time, law schools across Canada have registered their concerns about the integrity of a program of legal education at an institution that openly discriminates on a protected ground, such as sexual orientation.\n-30-\nYork University is helping to shape the global thinkers and thinking that will define tomorrow. York U’s unwavering commitment to excellence reflects a rich diversity of perspectives and a strong sense of social responsibility that sets us apart. A York U degree empowers graduates to thrive in the world and achieve their life goals through a rigorous academic foundation balanced by real-world experiential education. As a globally recognized research centre, York U is fully engaged in the critical discussions that lead to innovative solutions to the most pressing local and global social challenges. York U’s 11 faculties and 27 research centres are thinking bigger, broader and more globally, partnering with 288 leading universities worldwide. York U's community is strong − 55,000 students, 7,000 faculty and staff, and more than 250,000 alumni. Media Contact: Virginia Corner, Communications Manager, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, 416-736-5820, vcorner@osgoode.yorku.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.221 | 0.037 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".