MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7014189048

A palliative approach to care for people living with dementia: exploring perspectives from health and social care providers working in long-term care

2020· dissertation· en· W7014189048 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2020
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPalliative careDementiaHealth careQualitative researchPopulationCurative careEnd-of-life careSocial work
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: The number of Canadians living with dementia is rising as our population ages and is projected to reach 1.4 million people by 2031. Dementia is a terminal neurogenerative condition and is a major contributing factor to the transition into long-term care settings for many. Currently, most persons living in long-term care settings in Canada have a form of cognitive impairment or diagnosis of dementia, and most persons with dementia will die in a long-term care setting. A palliative approach to care that is appropriate for persons living with dementia in these settings is essential both now and in the future. However, research demonstrates that in Canada, end-of-life care and experiences are suboptimal for persons with dementia. Further, most Canadian long-term care homes do not have a formalized palliative care program and the integration of a palliative approach remains uncommon. There is growing international and Canadian interest in palliative approaches to care for persons with dementia and in long-term care settings, but there is a lack of Canadian research that provides a dementia-specific focus on palliative approaches in long-term care settings. \n \nObjectives: This qualitative descriptive study explored the perspectives of health and social care providers working in long-term care settings on the use and optimal delivery of a palliative approach to care for people with dementia living in long-term care settings. Specifically, this study examined the following research questions: (1) How is a palliative approach to care being used with persons with dementia who live in long-term care; (2) What are the perceptions of health and social care providers roles in supporting a palliative approach to care with persons with dementia; and (3) What contributes to an optimal palliative approach to care for people with dementia in long-term care? \n \nMethods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 health and social care providers who work with persons living with dementia in long-term care in Southern Ontario, Canada. Data were transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed using conventional content analysis in NVivo 12. \n \nResults: Of the 20 participants interviewed, their occupations included: activation manager, assistant director of care, dietary aide, nurse practitioner, occupational therapist, personal support worker, physician, recreational therapist, registered nurse, registered practical nurse, social worker, spiritual care provider. Five categories were identified through conventional content analysis: (1) Need for a Shared Understanding of a Palliative Approach to Care for Persons with Dementia; (2) Discussions About Goals of Care and the Future; (3) “End-of-Life Care” and Psychosocial, Grief, and Bereavement Support; (4) Need for Collaboration and Relationship-Based Care; and (5) Recommendations for an Optimal Palliative Approach to Care for Persons with Dementia. \n \nConclusion: Study results highlight that while palliative principles are recognized as important for persons with dementia, and components of a palliative approach are being used, there is a clear need for a shared understanding amongst staff, as well as further integration of a palliative approach to dementia care in long-term care. Study participants also identified recommendations for an optimal palliative approach for persons with dementia in long-term care, including: (1) Clarify roles in supporting a palliative approach for persons with dementia; (2) Support staff with grief and bereavement; (3) Improve staffing and funding models to be appropriate for the care needs of persons with dementia; (4) Timely and consistent care planning discussions; (5) Improve the availability and quality of end-of-life resources; (6) Improve the built environment to better suit the needs of persons with dementia; and (7) Provide continuous and accessible care provider education. Results from this study indicate there is a need to support health and social care providers to enable a higher quality integrated palliative approach to care for persons with dementia and in the emotional labour of caring for persons with dementia who are dying.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,026
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,059
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,138

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0260,031
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0210,019
Communication savante0,0100,010
Science ouverte0,0030,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,064
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)→Même sujetPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues→Travaux en français237 207→