MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7014864066

Relationship between longitudinal weight patterns of men during middle age and successful aging in later life : the Manitoba Follow-up Study

2006· dissertation· en· W7014864066 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2006
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNutrition and Health in Aging
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésSuccessful agingMiddle ageLongitudinal studyLongitudinal dataAge groupsLife expectancy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: Overweight and obesity are serious health conditions associated with the development of chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, Type2 diabetes, hypertension, and certain forms of cancer.Numerous studies have related overweight and obesity at different points in time with specif,rc health conditions later in life.Little research however has beçn reported characteizing longitudinal weight patterns throughout middle age and linking those pattems with a comprehensive set of indicators of successful aging.Methods: The longitudinal dataset of the Manitoba Follow-up Study, launched in 1948, was used to develop regression models relating summary measures of weight patterns during middle age (35-60 years) with the following outcomes of successful aging: survival to an advanced age (75 years), self-rated health, physical and mental functioning, limitations in daily activities, life satisfaction and self-report of aging successfully.Using a minimum of seven weight measurements over a35-60 year age window, weight pattems were charactenzed for each subject (n:2,298 men,31,274 weight measurements).Simple weight summary measures commonly used by other researchers including the first, last, maximum, minimum, and mean Body Mass lndex (BMÐ over the period were used.A classification method was also developed combining the longitudinal characteristics of duration and trend, using least squares'fourth-order polynomial curve fitting and extrema finding.Clinical and mortality data collected since 1948 and responses to the 1996 Successful Aging Questionnaire (n:1,438, mean age:76 years) were used to define successful aging outcomes.Logistic regression and multiple linear 1V regression were performed for categoncal and continuous outcomes respectively, adjusted for age, smoking and occupation history.Results: Approximately 25% of the men were predominantly normal weight (18.5 < BMI <25.0kú^') while maintaining steady weights (average BMI change < 0. r kglm2 per year) during middle age.These men showed more favorable successful aging outcomes in later life than men predominantly overweight (25 < BMI <30kglm2) with varying weight.Specifically, men with steady, normal weights during middle age had almost fwice the adjusted odds of reporting excellent health IOR 1 .gO,g5yo CI (l.39, 2.61)] or feeling they had aged successfully IOR 1 .74,95o/oCI (1.13, 2.69)], and were more likely to report excellent satisfaction with life loR 1 .40,95yocI (1.04, 1.gg)1.In addition, these men in later life had roughly half the odds of reporting limitations in daily activities, to have difÍiculty walking several blocks, or to have difficulty climbing several flights of stairs compared to men mainly overweight with appreciably changing weight during most of middle age.No evidence for significant differences between overweight patterns during middle age and premature mortality or mental functioning in later life were observed.Conclusion: Being predominantly overweight with variable weight throughout middle age may bring reduced odds of aging successfully, notably with increased impediments to physical functioning in later life.In light of these findings, current health promotion efforts targeting youth might also be extended to encourage healthy weight patterns among the middle-aged.ACKNO\ryLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I would like to salute Dr. Francis Mathewson who founded the Manitoba Follow-up Study, and all of the men and their families who have participated to the present day.Your individual

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,400
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,806

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,050
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Même sujetNutrition and Health in Aging→Travaux en français237 207→