Sens życia jako predyktor subiektywnej oceny zdrowia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The articic presents the studies which can he plaeed at the borderline between the \npsychology of health and an empirical existential psychology. They were inspired by the question \nit the meaning of life translates into the feeling of being healthy, namely, what in psychology \nis defined as a subjective health. The studies were based on a freedom and values related \ntheory of meaning of life, as well as a definition of health formulated on the Ottawa Card by \nthe WHO. Three basic notions of the freedom and values related theory of meaning of life \narc: meaning of life, personal freedom and sensitivity to values. They were defined on two \nlevels: psychological meaning and anthropological references. When differentiating inclining \nfrom reference, the possibilities of making use of philosophy as a fundamental science \nfor psychology from which a psychologist derives assumptions in relation to the being and \nhuman existence were taken into consideration. Meaning has a psychological dimension and \nrequires conceptualization, operationalisation, the method of researching and psychological \nconclusions. Reference, on the other hand, is philosophical and existential in nature and thus, \nit can appear in psychological studies at the stage of assumptions and results interpretation. \nAnthropological assumptions of psychological studies were derived from a three-dimensional \ntheory of human existence in Frankl’s (19X4) perspective, who distinguishes a physical, mental \nand spiritual existential dimension called by Popielski (1994) a neotie one. Assuming that \na spiritual sphere constitutes an ontological basis of a mental sphere was defined in the work \nas auguercza | Latin augeo meaning to generously supply]. Referring to Frankl’s theory, the \ncategory of augueretic notions was distinguished, that is, the ones which are ontologieally \nanchored in a spiritual sphere, and arc enriched by this sphere (subject, value, sense of life), \nin contrast to other categories which do not require a neotic perspective and in which it is \nnot definitely assumed (stress, intelligence, temper). A common dimension of augueretic notions, \nthat is, psychological ones with a spiritual dimension, is expressed by the fact that they \ninclude an element of transcendence towards the absolute as a basis of inexhaustible values. \nIt is an ontological transcendence in a separate sphere of being. It constitutes a definitional \nfeature a condition sine qua non, distinguishing augueretic notions from psychological \nones. On account of searching a salutogenetie dimension of the meaning of life a variable \nbeing a subjective life was introduced. Liach of theoretical notions was related to a questionnaire meeting llic standards of a psychological method. In order to verity a hypothesis \nabout an interdependence between the meaning of life and health, 168 healthy people were \nexamined, including 115 women and 53 men aged IX 64. The analysis ol the results showed \nthat a subjective independence and sensitivity to values indirectly, whereas the feeling of the \nmeaning of life directly, constitute positive predicators of a subjective evaluation of health \ncondition. A relation between sensitivity to values and a subjective evaluation of health condition \nrevealed in the ease of the subjects who considered their own development (a positive \ndependence) and illness (a negative dependence wilh evaluation of health) as an important \nand positive value in life. Summing up, one should draw a conclusion that the meaning of life \nis a salutogcnetic mechanism as a predictor of a positive evaluation of health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».