Sens życia jako predyktor subiektywnej oceny zdrowia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The articic presents the studies which can he plaeed at the borderline between the psychology of health and an empirical existential psychology. They were inspired by the question it the meaning of life translates into the feeling of being healthy, namely, what in psychology is defined as a subjective health. The studies were based on a freedom and values related theory of meaning of life, as well as a definition of health formulated on the Ottawa Card by the WHO. Three basic notions of the freedom and values related theory of meaning of life arc: meaning of life, personal freedom and sensitivity to values. They were defined on two levels: psychological meaning and anthropological references. When differentiating inclining from reference, the possibilities of making use of philosophy as a fundamental science for psychology from which a psychologist derives assumptions in relation to the being and human existence were taken into consideration. Meaning has a psychological dimension and requires conceptualization, operationalisation, the method of researching and psychological conclusions. Reference, on the other hand, is philosophical and existential in nature and thus, it can appear in psychological studies at the stage of assumptions and results interpretation. Anthropological assumptions of psychological studies were derived from a three-dimensional theory of human existence in Frankl’s (19X4) perspective, who distinguishes a physical, mental and spiritual existential dimension called by Popielski (1994) a neotie one. Assuming that a spiritual sphere constitutes an ontological basis of a mental sphere was defined in the work as auguercza | Latin augeo meaning to generously supply]. Referring to Frankl’s theory, the category of augueretic notions was distinguished, that is, the ones which are ontologieally anchored in a spiritual sphere, and arc enriched by this sphere (subject, value, sense of life), in contrast to other categories which do not require a neotic perspective and in which it is not definitely assumed (stress, intelligence, temper). A common dimension of augueretic notions, that is, psychological ones with a spiritual dimension, is expressed by the fact that they include an element of transcendence towards the absolute as a basis of inexhaustible values. It is an ontological transcendence in a separate sphere of being. It constitutes a definitional feature a condition sine qua non, distinguishing augueretic notions from psychological ones. On account of searching a salutogenetie dimension of the meaning of life a variable being a subjective life was introduced. Liach of theoretical notions was related to a questionnaire meeting llic standards of a psychological method. In order to verity a hypothesis about an interdependence between the meaning of life and health, 168 healthy people were examined, including 115 women and 53 men aged IX 64. The analysis ol the results showed that a subjective independence and sensitivity to values indirectly, whereas the feeling of the meaning of life directly, constitute positive predicators of a subjective evaluation of health condition. A relation between sensitivity to values and a subjective evaluation of health condition revealed in the ease of the subjects who considered their own development (a positive dependence) and illness (a negative dependence wilh evaluation of health) as an important and positive value in life. Summing up, one should draw a conclusion that the meaning of life is a salutogcnetic mechanism as a predictor of a positive evaluation of health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".