Sens życia jako predyktor subiektywnej oceny zdrowia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The articic presents the studies which can he plaeed at the borderline between the \npsychology of health and an empirical existential psychology. They were inspired by the question \nit the meaning of life translates into the feeling of being healthy, namely, what in psychology \nis defined as a subjective health. The studies were based on a freedom and values related \ntheory of meaning of life, as well as a definition of health formulated on the Ottawa Card by \nthe WHO. Three basic notions of the freedom and values related theory of meaning of life \narc: meaning of life, personal freedom and sensitivity to values. They were defined on two \nlevels: psychological meaning and anthropological references. When differentiating inclining \nfrom reference, the possibilities of making use of philosophy as a fundamental science \nfor psychology from which a psychologist derives assumptions in relation to the being and \nhuman existence were taken into consideration. Meaning has a psychological dimension and \nrequires conceptualization, operationalisation, the method of researching and psychological \nconclusions. Reference, on the other hand, is philosophical and existential in nature and thus, \nit can appear in psychological studies at the stage of assumptions and results interpretation. \nAnthropological assumptions of psychological studies were derived from a three-dimensional \ntheory of human existence in Frankl’s (19X4) perspective, who distinguishes a physical, mental \nand spiritual existential dimension called by Popielski (1994) a neotie one. Assuming that \na spiritual sphere constitutes an ontological basis of a mental sphere was defined in the work \nas auguercza | Latin augeo meaning to generously supply]. Referring to Frankl’s theory, the \ncategory of augueretic notions was distinguished, that is, the ones which are ontologieally \nanchored in a spiritual sphere, and arc enriched by this sphere (subject, value, sense of life), \nin contrast to other categories which do not require a neotic perspective and in which it is \nnot definitely assumed (stress, intelligence, temper). A common dimension of augueretic notions, \nthat is, psychological ones with a spiritual dimension, is expressed by the fact that they \ninclude an element of transcendence towards the absolute as a basis of inexhaustible values. \nIt is an ontological transcendence in a separate sphere of being. It constitutes a definitional \nfeature a condition sine qua non, distinguishing augueretic notions from psychological \nones. On account of searching a salutogenetie dimension of the meaning of life a variable \nbeing a subjective life was introduced. Liach of theoretical notions was related to a questionnaire meeting llic standards of a psychological method. In order to verity a hypothesis \nabout an interdependence between the meaning of life and health, 168 healthy people were \nexamined, including 115 women and 53 men aged IX 64. The analysis ol the results showed \nthat a subjective independence and sensitivity to values indirectly, whereas the feeling of the \nmeaning of life directly, constitute positive predicators of a subjective evaluation of health \ncondition. A relation between sensitivity to values and a subjective evaluation of health condition \nrevealed in the ease of the subjects who considered their own development (a positive \ndependence) and illness (a negative dependence wilh evaluation of health) as an important \nand positive value in life. Summing up, one should draw a conclusion that the meaning of life \nis a salutogcnetic mechanism as a predictor of a positive evaluation of health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".